ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Evaluating the Impact of the GDPR’s Data Subject Rights on Businesses
Abstract
In 2018, the European Union passed data governance legislation known as the General
Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The US lacks an equivalent policy, but many experts
agree that the passage of a comprehensive privacy law is imminent. Existing literature
suggests that the GDPR’s data subject rights contained in Articles 15 and 16 (the
right to access and rectify personal data) are the most difficult for businesses to
comply with. This research paper looks specifically at whether compliance challenges
associated with Articles 15 and 16 of the GDPR differ by business size and sector.
The findings reveal that small and mid-size enterprises are less likely to acknowledge
Articles 15 and 16 of the GDPR within their privacy policy, less likely to clearly
explain how consumers can access or rectify their data, and less likely to hire and
retain dedicated privacy staff. Despite these disparities, small and mid-size enterprises
fulfilled data access and rectification requests at roughly the same rate as large
enterprises.
Type
Master's projectDepartment
The Sanford School of Public PolicyPermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/22747Citation
Thibault, Jaymi (2021). Evaluating the Impact of the GDPR’s Data Subject Rights on Businesses. Master's project, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/22747.More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Sanford School Master of Public Policy (MPP) Program Master’s Projects
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info