Assessing risk of breast cancer in an ethnically South-East Asia population (results of a multiple ethnic groups study).
Abstract
<h4>Background</h4>Gail and others developed a model (GAIL) using age-at-menarche,
age-at-birth of first live child, number of previous benign breast biopsy examinations,
and number of first-degree-relatives with breast cancer as well as baseline age-specific
breast cancer risks for predicting the 5-year risk of invasive breast cancer for Caucasian
women. However, the validity of the model for projecting risk in South-East Asian
women is uncertain. We evaluated GAIL and attempted to improve its performance for
Singapore women of Chinese, Malay and Indian origins.<h4>Methods</h4>Data from the
Singapore Breast Screening Programme (SBSP) are used. Motivated by lower breast cancer
incidence in many Asian countries, we utilised race-specific invasive breast cancer
and other cause mortality rates for Singapore women to produce GAIL-SBSP. By using
risk factor information from a nested case-control study within SBSP, alternative
models incorporating fewer then additional risk factors were determined. Their accuracy
was assessed by comparing the expected cases (E) with the observed (O) by the ratio
(E/O) and 95% confidence interval (CI) and the respective concordance statistics estimated.<h4>Results</h4>From
28,883 women, GAIL-SBSP predicted 241.83 cases during the 5-year follow-up while 241
were reported (E/O=1.00, CI=0.88 to 1.14). Except for women who had two or more first-degree-relatives
with breast cancer, satisfactory prediction was present in almost all risk categories.
This agreement was reflected in Chinese and Malay, but not in Indian women. We also
found that a simplified model (S-GAIL-SBSP) including only age-at-menarche, age-at-birth
of first live child and number of first-degree-relatives performed similarly with
associated concordance statistics of 0.5997. Taking account of body mass index and
parity did not improve the calibration of S-GAIL-SBSP.<h4>Conclusions</h4>GAIL can
be refined by using national race-specific invasive breast cancer rates and mortality
rates for causes other than breast cancer. A revised model containing only three variables
(S-GAIL-SBSP) provides a simpler approach for projecting absolute risk of invasive
breast cancer in South-East Asia women. Nevertheless its role in counseling the individual
women regarding their risk of breast cancer remains problematical and needs to be
validated in independent data.
Type
Journal articleSubject
HumansBreast Neoplasms
Biopsy
Risk
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Case-Control Studies
Follow-Up Studies
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Middle Aged
Child
Child, Preschool
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Ethnic Groups
Singapore
Female
Young Adult
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/22831Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1186/1471-2407-12-529Publication Info
Gao, Fei; Machin, David; Chow, Khuan-Yew; Sim, Yu-Fan; Duffy, Stephen W; Matchar,
David B; ... Chia, Kee-Seng (2012). Assessing risk of breast cancer in an ethnically South-East Asia population (results
of a multiple ethnic groups study). BMC cancer, 12(1). pp. 529. 10.1186/1471-2407-12-529. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/22831.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
David Bruce Matchar
Professor of Medicine
My research relates to clinical practice improvement - from the development of clinical
policies to their implementation in real world clinical settings. Most recently my
major content focus has been cerebrovascular disease. Other major clinical areas in
which I work include the range of disabling neurological conditions, cardiovascular
disease, and cancer prevention. Notable features of my work are: (1) reliance on
analytic strategies such as meta-analysis, simulation, decision analy

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info