Awareness and acceptability of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among students at two historically Black universities (HBCU): a cross-sectional survey.
Abstract
<h4>Background</h4>Despite young African American adults (ages 18-24) being among
the highest risk groups for HIV infection, little is known about their awareness of
HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) - a once daily pill shown to be > 90% effective
in preventing HIV. To explore awareness and acceptability of PrEP among college students
in this demographic, we conducted a survey of attendees at two large historically
Black universities (HBCU) in North Carolina.<h4>Methods</h4>We administered a 14-item
questionnaire to students at two HBCUs in North Carolina between February and April
2018. Questions were formatted in a yes/no or multiple choice format. Questionnaire
items specifically addressed PrEP awareness and acceptability. Surveys were administered
to students at a campus health fair and while transiting the campus student union
via iPad. Response to all questions was optional. We fit a logistic regression model
to determine association of key demographic determinants with PrEP acceptability and
awareness. Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS, Cary, NC).<h4>Results</h4>Overall,
210 students participated in the survey, of which 60 completed all survey items as
presented. The survey cohort was 75% female, 89% heterosexual and 39% freshmen. The
mean age of respondents was 19.8 years (SD: 1.8). Fifty-two percent of survey respondents
reported that they were aware of PrEP prior to the time of survey administration.
Only 3% of respondents reported that they were on PrEP. The most common sources of
information on PrEP were campus health services (24%) and non-social media advertising
(15%). Of respondents who were aware of PrEP, 61% reported that they had heard about
in the 6 months prior to survey administration, while only 19% say they were aware
of it for more than a year. Regarding acceptability of PrEP, 58% of respondents reported
that they would take a once a day pill for HIV if they were at risk. Our logistic
regression analysis found no statistically significant associations between key demographic
factors and PrEP awareness. However, persons who perceived themselves to be at risk
for HIV acquisition were more likely to find once daily oral PrEP (relative risk 2.66
(95% CI 1.31-5.42)) as an acceptable prevention strategy than the rest of the survey
cohort.<h4>Conclusions</h4>African American HBCU students are becoming aware of PrEP,
and generally perceive the intervention as acceptable and worth consideration.
Type
Journal articleSubject
HumansHIV Infections
Cross-Sectional Studies
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Homosexuality, Male
Students
Universities
Adolescent
Adult
African Americans
North Carolina
Female
Male
Young Adult
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis
Surveys and Questionnaires
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23227Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1186/s12889-021-10996-2Publication Info
Okeke, Nwora Lance; McLaurin, Tony; Gilliam-Phillips, Ruth; Wagner, David H; Barnwell,
Valerie J; Johnson, Yolanda M; ... Mitchell, John T (2021). Awareness and acceptability of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among students
at two historically Black universities (HBCU): a cross-sectional survey. BMC public health, 21(1). pp. 943. 10.1186/s12889-021-10996-2. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23227.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Mehri Sadri McKellar
Associate Professor of Medicine
John T Mitchell
Associate Professor in Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Nwora Lance Okeke
Associate Professor of Medicine
Alphabetical list of authors with Scholars@Duke profiles.

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info