Swaying between Grace and Pomposity: The Imagined Modernity of Soong Mayling
Abstract
This paper is centrally concerned with the inconsistencies between the practices of
the Orientalized modernity and the Chinese indigenous sociocultural situation in the
Republic of China. I focus on Soong Mayling, the first lady of Generalissimo and President
Chiang Kai-shek, by tracing her early education in the US, marriage life, as well
as her political involvement after returning to China. I examine Orientalized figures’
attempts and possibilities to reconcile the discrepancies that existed between western
countries and China. I argue that Soong and her husband endeavored to take outer forms
of the West to construct their imagined naive modernity. Their ignorance of Chinese
culture and a complete adaptation of linear (evolutionary) ideology cut their reforms
off from Chinese people’s sentiments. Their reforms were inconsistent with China’s
socio-cultural situation and found no echo in people’s hearts. Failure was inevitable.
For sources, the core of the paper is mainly drawn from the speeches, written works,
and diaries of Soong Mayling and Chiang Kai-shek, while a major portion of this paper
includes news from both China domestic and worldwide newspapers and magazines. I have
also supplemented this information with the works and diaries of several intellectuals
such as Hu Shih, Sun Yat-sen, and Lin Yutang to enrich my portrait of Soong Mayling.
Type
Capstone projectDepartment
Graduate Liberal StudiesPermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23333Citation
Liu, Qianyu Thea (2021). Swaying between Grace and Pomposity: The Imagined Modernity of Soong Mayling. Capstone project, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23333.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Graduate Liberal Studies
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info