ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Genotype Predicts Outcomes in Fetuses and Neonates With Severe Congenital Long QT Syndrome.
Abstract
<h4>Objectives</h4>This study sought to determine the relationship between long QT
syndrome (LQTS) subtype (LTQ1, LTQ2, LTQ3) and postnatal cardiac events (CEs).<h4>Background</h4>LQTS
presenting with 2:1 atrioventricular block or torsades de pointes in the fetus and/or
neonate has been associated with risk for major CEs, but overall outcomes and predictors
remain unknown.<h4>Methods</h4>A retrospective study involving 25 international centers
evaluated the course of fetuses/newborns diagnosed with congenital LQTS and either
2:1 atrioventricular block or torsades de pointes. The primary outcomes were age at
first CE after dismissal from the newborn hospitalization and death and/or cardiac
transplantation during follow-up. CE was defined as aborted cardiac arrest, appropriate
shock from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, or sudden cardiac death.<h4>Results</h4>A
total of 84 fetuses and/or neonates were identified with LQTS (12 as LQT1, 35 as LQT2,
37 as LQT3). Median gestational age at delivery was 37 weeks (interquartile range:
35 to 39 weeks) and age at hospital discharge was 3 weeks (interquartile range: 2
to 5 weeks). Fetal demise occurred in 2 and pre-discharge death in 1. Over a median
of 5.2 years, there were 1 LQT1, 3 LQT2, and 23 LQT3 CEs (13 aborted cardiac arrests,
5 sudden cardiac deaths, and 9 appropriate shocks). One patient with LQT1 and 11 patients
with LQT3 died or received cardiac transplant during follow-up. The only multivariate
predictor of post-discharge CEs was LQT3 status (LQT3 vs. LQT2: hazard ratio: 8.4;
95% confidence interval: 2.6 to 38.9; p < 0.001), and LQT3, relative to LQT2, genotype
predicted death and/or cardiac transplant (p < 0.001).<h4>Conclusions</h4>In this
large multicenter study, fetuses and/or neonates with LQT3 but not those with LQT1
or LQT2 presenting with severe arrhythmias were at high risk of not only frequent,
but lethal CEs.
Type
Journal articleSubject
atrioventricular blockcardiac sympathetic denervation
fetal arrhythmia
fetus
genetic testing
implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
long QT syndrome
magnetocardiography
sudden cardiac death
torsades de pointes
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23422Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1016/j.jacep.2020.06.001Publication Info
Moore, Jeremy P; Gallotti, Roberto G; Shannon, Kevin M; Bos, J Martijn; Sadeghi, Elham;
Strasburger, Janette F; ... Ackerman, Michael J (2020). Genotype Predicts Outcomes in Fetuses and Neonates With Severe Congenital Long QT
Syndrome. JACC. Clinical electrophysiology, 6(12). pp. 1561-1570. 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.06.001. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23422.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Andrew Paul Landstrom
Associate Professor of Pediatrics
Dr. Landstrom is a physician scientist who specializes in the care of children and
young adults with arrhythmias, heritable cardiovascular diseases, and sudden unexplained
death syndromes. As a clinician, he is trained in pediatric cardiology with a focus
on arrhythmias and genetic diseases of the heart. He specializes in caring for patients
with heritable arrhythmia (channelopathies) such as long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome,
catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia,

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info