Understanding Immobility: Moving Beyond the Mobility Bias in Migration Studies
Abstract
This article suggests that there is a mobility bias in migration research: by focusing
on the “drivers” of migration — the forces that lead to the initiation and perpetuation
of migration flows — migration theories neglect the countervailing structural and
personal forces that restrict or resist these drivers and lead to different immobility
outcomes. To advance a research agenda on immobility, it offers a definition of immobility,
further develops the aspiration-capability framework as an analytical tool for exploring
the determinants of different forms of (im)mobility, synthesizes decades of interdisciplinary
research to help explain why people do not migrate or desire to migrate, and considers
future directions for further qualitative and quantitative research on immobility.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23454Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1177/0197918319831952Publication Info
Schewel, K (2020). Understanding Immobility: Moving Beyond the Mobility Bias in Migration Studies. International Migration Review, 54(2). pp. 328-355. 10.1177/0197918319831952. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23454.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Kerilyn Daniel Schewel
Lecturing Fellow in the Sanford School of Public Policy

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info