ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Revisiting aspiration and ability in international migration
Abstract
It is a refreshingly simple thought that migration is the combined result of two factors:
the aspiration to migrate and the ability to migrate. Without having to resort to
overly structural or individualistic explanations, this analytical distinction helps
disentangle complex questions around why some people migrate but others do not. Still,
aspiration and ability raise their own thorny theoretical and methodological questions.
To begin with, what does it mean to have migration aspirations? How can such concepts
be objects of empirical research? And is it meaningful to say that individuals possess
the ability to migrate if their preference is to stay? The aspiration/ability model
was originally proposed in this journal and has since been diversely applied and adapted.
In this article, we look back at more than a decade of research to examine a series
of theoretical and empirical developments related to the aspiration/ability model
and its extensions. We identify two-step approaches as a class of analytical frameworks
that share the basic logic of the aspiration/ability model. Covering expansive theoretical,
methodological and empirical ground, we seek to lay a foundation for new research
on global migration in its diverse forms.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23456Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1080/1369183X.2017.1384146Publication Info
Carling, J; & Schewel, K (2018). Revisiting aspiration and ability in international migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(6). pp. 945-963. 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1384146. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23456.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Kerilyn Daniel Schewel
Lecturing Fellow in the Sanford School of Public Policy

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info