Feasibility of Interferential and Pulsed Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for Neuromodulation at the Human Scale.
Abstract
<h4>Objectives</h4>Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is a promising tool for
modulating neural activity, but tES has poor penetrability and spatiotemporal resolution
compared to invasive techniques like deep brain stimulation (DBS). Interferential
strategies for alternating-current stimulation (IF-tACS) and pulsed/intersectional
strategies for transcranial direct-current stimulation (IS-tDCS) address some of the
limitations of tES, but the comparative advantages and disadvantages of these new
techniques is not well understood. This study's objective was to evaluate the suprathreshold
and subthreshold membrane dynamics of neurons in response to IF-tACS and IS-tDCS.<h4>Materials
and methods</h4>We analyzed the biophysics of IF-tACS and IS-tDCS using a bioelectric
field model of tES. Neural responses were quantified for suprathreshold generation
of action potentials in axons and for subthreshold modulation of membrane dynamics
in spiking pyramidal neurons.<h4>Results</h4>IF-tACS and IS-tDCS could not directly
activate axons at or below 10 mA, but within this current range, these fields were
able to modulate, albeit indirectly, spiking activity in the neuron model. IF-tACS
facilitated phase synchronization similar to tACS, and IS-tDCS enhanced and suppressed
spiking activity similar to tDCS; however, in either case, the modulatory effects
of these fields were less potent than their standard counterparts at a matched field
intensity. Moreover, neither IF-tACS nor IS-tDCS improved the spatial selectivity
of their parent strategies.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Enhancing the spatiotemporal precision
and penetrability of tES with interferential and intersectional strategies is possible
at the human scale. However, IF-tACS or IS-tDCS will likely require spatial multiplexing
with multiple simultaneous sources to counteract their reduced potency, compared to
standard techniques, to maintain stimulation currents at tolerable levels.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23858Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1111/ner.13137Publication Info
Howell, Bryan; & McIntyre, Cameron C (2021). Feasibility of Interferential and Pulsed Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for Neuromodulation
at the Human Scale. Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 24(5). pp. 843-853. 10.1111/ner.13137. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23858.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Bryan Howell
Assistant Research Professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering
My lab studies implantable and wearable devices for treating neurological impairment,
namely with deep brain stimulation (DBS) and transcranial electrical stimulation (tES).
Projects evolve through theoretical and preclinical stages of development, combining
biophysical and dynamic causal modeling, medical imaging, and device prototyping,
to test new concepts and strategies for these neurotechnologies. Noninvasive studies
on tES are conducted in tissue phantoms and healthy human subjects in-hous

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info