Skip to main content
Duke University Libraries
DukeSpace Scholarship by Duke Authors
  • Login
  • Ask
  • Menu
  • Login
  • Ask a Librarian
  • Search & Find
  • Using the Library
  • Research Support
  • Course Support
  • Libraries
  • About
View Item 
  •   DukeSpace
  • Duke Scholarly Works
  • Scholarly Articles
  • View Item
  •   DukeSpace
  • Duke Scholarly Works
  • Scholarly Articles
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Incentives for Uptake of and Adherence to Outpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Services: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.

Thumbnail
View / Download
1.3 Mb
Date
2021-09-10
Authors
Matchar, David Bruce
Young, Sherry Hsueh Yi
Sim, Rita
Yu, Christine Jia Ying
Yan, Xiaoxi
De Silva, Deidre Anne
Chakraborty, Bibhas
Repository Usage Stats
23
views
28
downloads
Abstract
<h4>Objective</h4>To determine if rehabilitation uptake and adherence can be increased by providing coordinated transportation (increased convenience) and eliminating out-of-pocket costs (reduced expense).<h4>Design</h4>Three-arm randomized controlled trial Setting: Stroke units of two Singapore tertiary hospitals Participants: Singaporeans or permanent residents aged ≥21 years who were diagnosed with stroke and discharged home with physician's recommendation to continue outpatient rehabilitation.<h4>Interventions</h4>A Transportation Incentives arm (T), which provides free transportation services, a Transportation & Sessions Incentives arm (T&S), offering free transportation and prescribed stroke rehabilitation sessions, and a control arm, Education (E), consisting of a stroke rehabilitation educational programme.<h4>Main outcome measures</h4>The primary study outcome was uptake of outpatient rehabilitation services (ORS) amongst post-stroke patients, and key pre-defined secondary outcomes being number of sessions attended and adherence to prescribed sessions.<h4>Results</h4>Uptake rate of ORS was 73.0% for E (CI, 63.8%-82.3%), 81.8% for T (CI, 73.8%-89.8%), and 84.3% for T&S (CI, 76.7%-91.8%). Differences of T and T&S versus E were not statistically significant (p=0.22 and p=0.10, respectively). However, average number of rehabilitation sessions attended were significantly higher in both intervention arms: 5.50 (SD, 7.65) for T and 7.51 (SD, 9.52) for T&S versus 3.26 (SD, 4.22) for control arm (E) (p-value for T vs E =0.017; p-value for T&S vs E =0.000.) Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that persistence was higher for T&S compared to E (p=0.029).<h4>Conclusions</h4>This study has demonstrated a possibility in increasing the uptake of and persistence to stroke ORS with free transportation and sessions. Incentivizing stroke survivors to take up ORS is a new strategy worthy of further exploration for future policy change in financing ORS or other long-term care services.
Type
Journal article
Subject
Motivation
Outpatients
Patient compliance
Rehabilitation
Stroke rehabilitation
Transportation
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23984
Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1016/j.apmr.2021.08.013
Publication Info
Matchar, David Bruce; Young, Sherry Hsueh Yi; Sim, Rita; Yu, Christine Jia Ying; Yan, Xiaoxi; De Silva, Deidre Anne; & Chakraborty, Bibhas (2021). Incentives for Uptake of and Adherence to Outpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Services: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.08.013. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23984.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
  • Scholarly Articles
More Info
Show full item record

Scholars@Duke

Matchar

David Bruce Matchar

Professor of Medicine
My research relates to clinical practice improvement - from the development of clinical policies to their implementation in real world clinical settings. Most recently my major content focus has been cerebrovascular disease. Other major clinical areas in which I work include the range of disabling neurological conditions, cardiovascular disease, and cancer prevention. Notable features of my work are: (1) reliance on analytic strategies such as meta-analysis, simulation, decision analy
Open Access

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy

Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles


Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info

Make Your Work Available Here

How to Deposit

Browse

All of DukeSpaceCommunities & CollectionsAuthorsTitlesTypesBy Issue DateDepartmentsAffiliations of Duke Author(s)SubjectsBy Submit DateThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesTypesBy Issue DateDepartmentsAffiliations of Duke Author(s)SubjectsBy Submit Date

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
Duke University Libraries

Contact Us

411 Chapel Drive
Durham, NC 27708
(919) 660-5870
Perkins Library Service Desk

Digital Repositories at Duke

  • Report a problem with the repositories
  • About digital repositories at Duke
  • Accessibility Policy
  • Deaccession and DMCA Takedown Policy

TwitterFacebookYouTubeFlickrInstagramBlogs

Sign Up for Our Newsletter
  • Re-use & Attribution / Privacy
  • Harmful Language Statement
  • Support the Libraries
Duke University