dc.contributor.author |
Matchar, David Bruce |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Young, Sherry Hsueh Yi |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Sim, Rita |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Yu, Christine Jia Ying |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Yan, Xiaoxi |
|
dc.contributor.author |
De Silva, Deidre Anne |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Chakraborty, Bibhas |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-11-15T01:23:53Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-11-15T01:23:53Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2021-09-10 |
|
dc.identifier |
S0003-9993(21)01422-2 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
0003-9993 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1532-821X |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23984 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
<h4>Objective</h4>To determine if rehabilitation uptake and adherence can be increased
by providing coordinated transportation (increased convenience) and eliminating out-of-pocket
costs (reduced expense).<h4>Design</h4>Three-arm randomized controlled trial Setting:
Stroke units of two Singapore tertiary hospitals Participants: Singaporeans or permanent
residents aged ≥21 years who were diagnosed with stroke and discharged home with physician's
recommendation to continue outpatient rehabilitation.<h4>Interventions</h4>A Transportation
Incentives arm (T), which provides free transportation services, a Transportation
& Sessions Incentives arm (T&S), offering free transportation and prescribed stroke
rehabilitation sessions, and a control arm, Education (E), consisting of a stroke
rehabilitation educational programme.<h4>Main outcome measures</h4>The primary study
outcome was uptake of outpatient rehabilitation services (ORS) amongst post-stroke
patients, and key pre-defined secondary outcomes being number of sessions attended
and adherence to prescribed sessions.<h4>Results</h4>Uptake rate of ORS was 73.0%
for E (CI, 63.8%-82.3%), 81.8% for T (CI, 73.8%-89.8%), and 84.3% for T&S (CI, 76.7%-91.8%).
Differences of T and T&S versus E were not statistically significant (p=0.22 and p=0.10,
respectively). However, average number of rehabilitation sessions attended were significantly
higher in both intervention arms: 5.50 (SD, 7.65) for T and 7.51 (SD, 9.52) for T&S
versus 3.26 (SD, 4.22) for control arm (E) (p-value for T vs E =0.017; p-value for
T&S vs E =0.000.) Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that persistence was higher for
T&S compared to E (p=0.029).<h4>Conclusions</h4>This study has demonstrated a possibility
in increasing the uptake of and persistence to stroke ORS with free transportation
and sessions. Incentivizing stroke survivors to take up ORS is a new strategy worthy
of further exploration for future policy change in financing ORS or other long-term
care services.
|
|
dc.language |
eng |
|
dc.publisher |
Elsevier BV |
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
|
dc.relation.isversionof |
10.1016/j.apmr.2021.08.013 |
|
dc.subject |
Motivation |
|
dc.subject |
Outpatients |
|
dc.subject |
Patient compliance |
|
dc.subject |
Rehabilitation |
|
dc.subject |
Stroke rehabilitation |
|
dc.subject |
Transportation |
|
dc.title |
Incentives for Uptake of and Adherence to Outpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Services:
A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.
|
|
dc.type |
Journal article |
|
duke.contributor.id |
Matchar, David Bruce|0063297 |
|
dc.date.updated |
2021-11-15T01:23:51Z |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
School of Medicine |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Duke Global Health Institute |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Pathology |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Medicine, General Internal Medicine |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Duke |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
University Institutes and Centers |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Institutes and Provost's Academic Units |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Clinical Science Departments |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Medicine |
|
pubs.publication-status |
Published |
|
duke.contributor.orcid |
Matchar, David Bruce|0000-0003-3020-2108 |
|