ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
SNIa-Cosmology Analysis Results from Simulated LSST Images: from Difference Imaging to Constraints on Dark Energy
Abstract
The Vera Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) is expected
to process ${\sim}10^6$ transient detections per night. For precision
measurements of cosmological parameters and rates, it is critical to understand
the detection efficiency, magnitude limits, artifact contamination levels, and
biases in the selection and photometry. Here we rigorously test the LSST
Difference Image Analysis (DIA) pipeline using simulated images from the Rubin
Observatory LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration (DESC) Data Challenge (DC2)
simulation for the Wide-Fast-Deep (WFD) survey area. DC2 is the first
large-scale (300 deg$^2$) image simulation of a transient survey that includes
realistic cadence, variable observing conditions, and CCD image artifacts. We
analyze ${\sim}$15 deg$^2$ of DC2 over a 5-year time-span in which artificial
point-sources from Type Ia Supernovae (SNIa) light curves have been overlaid
onto the images. We measure the detection efficiency as a function of
Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and find a $50\%$ efficiency at $\rm{SNR}=5.8$. The
magnitude limits for each filter are: $u=23.66$, $g=24.69$, $r=24.06$,
$i=23.45$, $z=22.54$, $y=21.62$ $\rm{mag}$. The artifact contamination is
$\sim90\%$ of detections, corresponding to $\sim1000$ artifacts/deg$^2$ in $g$
band, and falling to 300 per deg$^2$ in $y$ band. The photometry has biases
$<1\%$ for magnitudes $19.5 < m <23$. Our DIA performance on simulated images
is similar to that of the Dark Energy Survey pipeline applied to real images.
We also characterize DC2 image properties to produce catalog-level simulations
needed for distance bias corrections. We find good agreement between DC2 data
and simulations for distributions of SNR, redshift, and fitted light-curve
properties. Applying a realistic SNIa-cosmology analysis for redshifts $z<1$,
we recover the input cosmology parameters to within statistical uncertainties.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/24140Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Daniel M. Scolnic
Associate Professor of Physics
Use observational tools to measure the expansion history of the universe. Trying
to answer big questions like 'what is dark energy?'.
Christopher Walter
Professor of Physics
I am a professor in the physics department studying particle physics and cosmology.
I try to understand both the nature of the ghostly particles called neutrinos in giant
detectors deep underground, and why the expansion of the universe is accelerating
using telescopes on top of mountains. My background and training is originally in
particle physics and I was part of the team that showed the sub-atomic particles called
neutrinos have mass. The leader of our team, T. Kajita
Alphabetical list of authors with Scholars@Duke profiles.

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info