Abstract
Like most scientists, chemists frequently have reason to reuse some materials from
their own published articles in new ones, especially when producing a series of closely
related papers. Text recycling, the reuse of material from one’s own works, has become
a source of considerable confusion and frustration for researchers and editors alike.
While text recycling does not pose the same level of ethical concern as matters such
as data fabrication or plagiarism, it is much more common and complicated. Much of
the confusion stems from a lack of clarity and consistency in publisher guidelines
and publishing contracts. Matters are even more complicated when manuscripts are coauthored
by researchers residing in different countries. This chapter demonstrates the nature
of these problems through an analysis of a set of documents from a single publisher,
the American Chemical Society (ACS). The ACS was chosen because it is a leading publisher
of chemistry research and because its guidelines and publishing contracts address
text recycling in unusual detail. The present analysis takes advantage of this detail
to show both the importance of clear, thoughtfully designed text recycling policies
and the problems that can arise when publishers fail to bring their various documents
into close alignment.
Material is made available in this collection at the direction of authors according
to their understanding of their rights in that material. You may download and use
these materials in any manner not prohibited by copyright or other applicable law.
Rights for Collection: Research and Writings
Works are deposited here by their authors, and
represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials
and descriptions may include offensive content.
More info