Utilization of Brain Tissue Oxygenation Monitoring and Association with Mortality Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.
Abstract
<h4>Background</h4>The aim of this study was to describe the utilization patterns
of brain tissue oxygen (PbtO2) monitoring following severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and determine associations
with mortality, health care use, and pulmonary toxicity.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted
a retrospective cohort study of patients from United States trauma centers participating
in the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Databank between 2008 and 2016.
We examined patients with severe TBI (defined by admission Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 8)
over the age of 18 years who survived more than 24 h from admission and required intracranial
pressure (ICP) monitoring. The primary exposure was PbtO2 monitor placement. The primary outcome was hospital mortality, defined as death during
the hospitalization or discharge to hospice. Secondary outcomes were examined to determine
the association of PbtO2 monitoring with health care use and pulmonary toxicity and included the following:
(1) intensive care unit length of stay, (2) hospital length of stay, and (3) development
of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Regression analysis was used to assess
differences in outcomes between patients exposed to PbtO2 monitor placement and those without exposure by using propensity weighting to address
selection bias due to the nonrandom allocation of treatment groups and patient dropout.<h4>Results</h4>A
total of 35,501 patients underwent placement of an ICP monitor. There were 1,346 (3.8%)
patients who also underwent PbtO2 monitor placement, with significant variation regarding calendar year and hospital.
Patients who underwent placement of a PbtO2 monitor had a crude in-hospital mortality of 31.1%, compared with 33.5% in patients
who only underwent placement of an ICP monitor (adjusted risk ratio 0.84, 95% confidence
interval 0.76-0.93). The development of the ARDS was comparable between patients who
underwent placement of a PbtO2 monitor and patients who only underwent placement of an ICP monitor (9.2% vs. 9.8%,
adjusted risk ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.73-1.09).<h4>Conclusions</h4>PbtO2 monitor utilization varied widely throughout the study period by calendar year and
hospital. PbtO2 monitoring in addition to ICP monitoring, compared with ICP monitoring alone, was
associated with a decreased in-hospital mortality, a longer length of stay, and a
similar risk of ARDS. These findings provide further guidance for clinicians caring
for patients with severe TBI while awaiting completion of further randomized controlled
trials.
Type
Journal articleSubject
BrainHumans
Monitoring, Physiologic
Retrospective Studies
Intracranial Pressure
Adult
Middle Aged
Brain Injuries, Traumatic
Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/25393Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1007/s12028-021-01394-yPublication Info
Komisarow, Jordan M; Toro, Camilo; Curley, Jonathan; Mills, Brianna; Cho, Christopher;
Simo, Georges Motchoffo; ... Krishnamoorthy, Vijay (2022). Utilization of Brain Tissue Oxygenation Monitoring and Association with Mortality
Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurocritical care, 36(2). pp. 350-356. 10.1007/s12028-021-01394-y. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/25393.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Adrian Felipe Hernandez
Duke Health Cardiology Professor
Michael Lucas James
Associate Professor of Anesthesiology
I have an extensive background in neuroanesthesia and neurointensive care and a special
research interest in translational and clinical research aspects of intracerebral
hemorrhage.
After completing residencies in neurology and anesthesiology with fellowships in neurocritical
care, neuroanesthesia, and vascular neurology, I developed a murine model of intracerebral
hemorrhage in the Multidisciplinary Neuroprotection Laboratories at Duke University.
After optimization of the model, I h
Jordan Komisarow
Assistant Professor of Neurosurgery
Vijay Krishnamoorthy
Associate Professor of Anesthesiology
Daniel Todd Laskowitz
Professor of Neurology
Our laboratory uses molecular biology, cell culture, and animal modeling techniques
to examine the CNS response to acute injury. In particular, our laboratory examines
the role of microglial activation and the endogenous CNS inflammatory response in
exacerbating secondary injury following acute brain insult. Much of the in vitro work
in this laboratory is dedicated to elucidating cellular responses to injury with the
ultimate goal of exploring new therapeutic interventions in the clinical settin
Joseph P. Mathew
Jerry Reves, M.D. Distinguished Professor of Cardiac Anesthesiology
Current research interests include:1. The relationship between white matter patency,
functional connectivity (fMRI) and neurocognitive function following cardiac surgery.2.
The relationship between global and regional cortical beta-amyloid deposition and
postoperative cognitive decline.3. The effect of lidocaine infusion upon neurocognitive
function following cardiac surgery.4. The association between genotype and outcome
after cardiac surgery.5. Atrial fibrillation
Tetsu Ohnuma
Assistant Professor in Anesthesiology
John Howard Sampson
Robert H., M.D. and Gloria Wilkins Professor of Neurosurgery, in the School of Medicine
Current research activities involve the immunotherapeutic targeting of a tumor-specific
mutation in the epidermal growth factor receptor. Approaches used to target this tumor-specific
epitope include unarmed and radiolabeled antibody therapy and cell mediated approaches
using peptide vaccines and dendritic cells. Another area of interest involves drug
delivery to brain tumors. Translational and clinical work is carried out in this area
to formulate the relationship between various direct intratu
Alphabetical list of authors with Scholars@Duke profiles.

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info