Skip to main content
Duke University Libraries
DukeSpace Scholarship by Duke Authors
  • Login
  • Ask
  • Menu
  • Login
  • Ask a Librarian
  • Search & Find
  • Using the Library
  • Research Support
  • Course Support
  • Libraries
  • About
View Item 
  •   DukeSpace
  • Theses and Dissertations
  • Masters Theses
  • View Item
  •   DukeSpace
  • Theses and Dissertations
  • Masters Theses
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

A Comparative Study of Radiomics and Deep-Learning Approaches for Predicting Surgery Outcomes in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Thumbnail
View / Download
2.5 Mb
Date
2022
Author
Zhang, Haozhao
Advisors
Wang, Chunhao
Yin, Fang-fang
Repository Usage Stats
98
views
130
downloads
Abstract

Purpose: To compare radiomics and deep-learning (DL) methods for predicting NSCLC surgical treatment failure. Methods: A cohort of 83 patients undergoing lobectomy or wedge resection for early-stage NSCLC from our institution was studied. There were 7 local failures and 16 non-local failures (regional and/or distant). Gross tumor volumes (GTV) were contoured on pre-surgery CT datasets after 1mm3 isotropic resolution resampling. For the radiomics analysis, 92 radiomics features were extracted from the GTV and z-score normalizations were performed. The multivariate association between the extracted features and clinical endpoints were investigated using a random forest model following 70%-30% training-test split. For the DL analysis, both 2D and 3D model designs were executed using two different deep neural networks as transfer learning problems: in 2D-based design, 8x8cm2 axial fields-of-view(FOVs) centered within the GTV were adopted for VGG-16 training; in 3D-based design, 8x8x8 cm3 FOVs centered within the GTV were adopted for U-Net’s encoder path training. In both designs, data augmentation (rotation, translation, flip, noise) was included to overcome potential training convergence problems due to the imbalanced dataset, and the same 70%-30% training-test split was used. The performances of the 3 models (Radiomics, 2D-DL, 3D-DL) were tested to predict outcomes including local failure, non-local failure, and disease-free survival. Sensitivity/specificity/accuracy/ROC results were obtained from their 20 trained versions. Results: The radiomics models showed limited performances in all three outcome prediction tasks. The 2D-DL design showed significant improvement compared to the radiomics results in predicting local failure (ROC AUC = 0.546±0.056). The 3D-DL design achieved the best performance for all three outcomes (local failure ROC AUC = 0.768 ± 0.051, non-local failure ROC AUC = 0.683±0.027, disease-free ROC AUC = 0.694±0.042) with statistically significant improvements from radiomics/2D-DL results. Conclusions: 3D-DL execution outperformed the 2D-DL in predicting clinical outcomes after surgery for early-stage NSCLC. By contrast, classic radiomics approach did not achieve satisfactory results.

Description
Master's thesis
Type
Master's thesis
Department
DKU - Medical Physics Master of Science Program
Subject
Medical imaging
Deep Learning
Lung cancer
NSCLC
outcome prediction
Radiomics
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/25413
Citation
Zhang, Haozhao (2022). A Comparative Study of Radiomics and Deep-Learning Approaches for Predicting Surgery Outcomes in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Master's thesis, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/25413.
Collections
  • Masters Theses
More Info
Show full item record
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

Rights for Collection: Masters Theses


Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info

Make Your Work Available Here

How to Deposit

Browse

All of DukeSpaceCommunities & CollectionsAuthorsTitlesTypesBy Issue DateDepartmentsAffiliations of Duke Author(s)SubjectsBy Submit DateThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesTypesBy Issue DateDepartmentsAffiliations of Duke Author(s)SubjectsBy Submit Date

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
Duke University Libraries

Contact Us

411 Chapel Drive
Durham, NC 27708
(919) 660-5870
Perkins Library Service Desk

Digital Repositories at Duke

  • Report a problem with the repositories
  • About digital repositories at Duke
  • Accessibility Policy
  • Deaccession and DMCA Takedown Policy

TwitterFacebookYouTubeFlickrInstagramBlogs

Sign Up for Our Newsletter
  • Re-use & Attribution / Privacy
  • Harmful Language Statement
  • Support the Libraries
Duke University