Transitioning to virtual interaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: Impact on the family connects postpartum home visiting program activity.
Abstract
In this paper, we analyze program activity for Family Connects (FC), an evidence-based
postpartum home-visiting intervention, during the COVID-19 pandemic. When the pandemic
began, FC transitioned to a virtual protocol which maintains key psychosocial components
of the in-person protocol and adjusts health assessments to address the lack of in-person
contact. Program performance is contrasted for periods before the pandemic onset (April
2019-March 2020) and after the onset (April 2020-March 2021), involving 10,280 scheduled
visits and 6696 visited families (46% non-Hispanic white; 20% non-Hispanic Black;
23% Hispanic; and 10% other race). Post-pandemic onset, FC program participation rates
were at 89.8% of pre-pandemic levels. Home visitors observed post-onset increases
in families' concerns about home safety but declines in families' needs related to
infant care. Community connections were facilitated for 42.9% of visited families
post-pandemic onset compared to 51.1% pre-pandemic onset. We conclude that post-pandemic
onset virtual delivery rates of FC declined but are high enough to merit continued
implementation during a period when some families will decline in-person visits. When
in-person visits are deemed safe per public health guidelines, the findings suggest
a hybrid approach that could maximize program outreach by prioritizing in-person contact
and offering virtual delivery as a second choice.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/25478Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1002/imhj.21953Publication Info
Rybińska, Anna; Best, Debra L; Goodman, W Benjamin; Bai, Yu; & Dodge, Kenneth A (2022). Transitioning to virtual interaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: Impact on the family
connects postpartum home visiting program activity. Infant mental health journal, 43(1). pp. 159-172. 10.1002/imhj.21953. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/25478.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Yu Bai
Statistician III
Debra Lynn Best
Associate Professor of Pediatrics
Dr. Best's scholarly interests include the following:
1. ADVOCACY EDUCATION AND FACULTY PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: From 2007-2020, I directed
the Duke pediatric residency program’s “Community Pediatrics and Advocacy”
rotation and developed strong partnerships locally, regionally through the Carolinas
Collaborative, and nationally through the American Academy of Pediatrics Community
Pediatrics Training Initiative. My work has focused on curricular developmen
Kenneth A. Dodge
William McDougall Distinguished Professor of Public Policy Studies
Kenneth A. Dodge is the William McDougall Distinguished Professor of Public Policy
and Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience at Duke University. He is also the founding
and past director of the Center for Child and Family Policy, as well as the founder
of Family Connects International.
Dodge is a leading scholar in the development and prevention of aggressive and violent
beha
Ben Goodman
Research Scientist
Ben Goodman is a research scientist at the Center for Child and Family Policy. His
research interests focus broadly on the implementation and evaluation of population-based
interventions to reduce child maltreatment and improve parent and child health and
well-being, including the evidence-based Family Connects postpartum nurse home visiting
program. His research also examines how sources of stress and support shape the quality
of parent-child relationships, parents’ own well- being, an
Alphabetical list of authors with Scholars@Duke profiles.

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info