The Effect of Government Repression on Civil Society: Evidence from Cambodia
Abstract
Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are a core component of a robust civil society
and operate in a wide variety of sectors, ranging from service delivery to political
advocacy. However, research has yet to systematically investigate whether the impact
of government repression varies across NGO activities. We hypothesize that advocacy
NGOs are more affected by repression than those in service delivery. Surveying 176
employees from 106 NGOs in Cambodia, we employ a conjoint experiment to examine how
the level of repression affects a task crucial to NGOs' survival: obtaining funding
via grant applications. We find that while increases in the severity of repression
appear to have a stronger deterrent effect for advocacy NGOs, repression has a large
deterrent effect on service NGOs as well. Interviews and text analysis of open-ended
questions suggest that local officials target both advocacy and service delivery NGOs,
but for different reasons. Our findings speak to the spread of authoritarianism and
the challenges NGOs face in countries with closing civic spaces.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/25958Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1093/isq/sqac028Publication Info
Springman, J; Malesky, E; Right, L; & Wibbels, E (2022). The Effect of Government Repression on Civil Society: Evidence from Cambodia. International Studies Quarterly, 66(3). 10.1093/isq/sqac028. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/25958.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Edmund Malesky
Professor of Political Science
Malesky is a specialist on Southeast Asia, particularly Vietnam. Currently, Malesky's
research agenda is very much at the intersection of Comparative and International
Political Economy, falling into three major categories: 1) Authoritarian political
institutions and their consequences; 2) The political influence of foreign direct
investment and multinational corporations; and 3) Political institutions, private
business development, and formalization.

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info