ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
COVID-19: The Time for Collaboration Between Long-Term Services and Supports, Health Care Systems, and Public Health Is Now.
Abstract
Policy Points To address systemic problems amplified by COVID-19, we need to restructure
US long-term services and supports (LTSS) as they relate to both the health care systems
and public health systems. We present both near-term and long-term policy solutions.
Seven near-term policy recommendations include requiring the uniform public reporting
of COVID-19 cases in all LTSS settings; identifying and supporting unpaid caregivers;
bolstering protections for the direct care workforce; increasing coordination between
public health departments and LTSS agencies and providers; enhancing collaboration
and communication across health, LTSS, and public health systems; further reducing
barriers to telehealth in LTSS; and providing incentives to care for vulnerable populations.
Long-term reform should focus on comprehensive workforce development, comprehensive
LTSS financing reform, and the creation of an age-friendly public health system.<h4>Context</h4>The
heavy toll of COVID-19 brings the failings of the long-term services and supports
(LTSS) system in the United States into sharp focus. Although these are not new problems,
the pandemic has exacerbated and amplified their impact to a point that they are impossible
to ignore. The primary blame for the high rates of COVID-19 infections and deaths
has been assigned to formal LTSS care settings, specifically nursing homes. Yet other
systemic problems have been unearthed during this pandemic: the failure to coordinate
the US public health system at the federal level and the effects of long-term disinvestment
and neglect of state- and local-level public health programs. Together these failures
have contributed to an inability to coordinate with the LTSS system and to act early
to protect residents and staff in the LTSS care settings that are hotspots for infection,
spread, and serious negative health outcomes.<h4>Methods</h4>We analyze several impacts
of the COVID-19 pandemic on the US LTSS system and policy arrangements. The economic
toll on state budgets has been multifaceted, and the pandemic has had a direct impact
on Medicaid, the primary funder of LTSS, which in turn has further exacerbated the
states' fiscal problems. Both the inequalities across race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic
status as well as the increased burden on unpaid caregivers are clear. So too is the
need to better integrate LTSS with the health, social care, and public health systems.<h4>Findings</h4>We
propose seven near-term actions that US policymakers could take: implementing a uniform
public reporting of COVID-19 cases in LTSS settings; identifying and supporting unpaid
caregivers; bolstering support for the direct care workforce; increasing coordination
between public health departments and LTSS agencies and providers; enhancing collaboration
and communication across health, LTSS, and public health systems; further reducing
the barriers to telehealth in LTSS; and providing incentives to care for our most
vulnerable populations. Our analysis also demonstrates that our nation requires comprehensive
reform to build the LTSS system we need through comprehensive workforce development,
universal coverage through comprehensive financing reform, and the creation of an
age-friendly public health system.<h4>Conclusions</h4>COVID-19 has exposed the many
deficits of the US LTSS system and made clear the interdependence of LTSS with public
health. Policymakers have an opportunity to address these failings through a substantive
reform of the LTSS system and increased collaboration with public health agencies
and leaders. The opportunity for reform is now.
Type
Journal articleSubject
HumansLong-Term Care
Public Health
Health Policy
Health Care Reform
Delivery of Health Care
United States
Pandemics
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/26132Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1111/1468-0009.12500Publication Info
Dawson, Walter D; Boucher, Nathan A; Stone, Robyn; & VAN Houtven, Courtney H (2021). COVID-19: The Time for Collaboration Between Long-Term Services and Supports, Health
Care Systems, and Public Health Is Now. The Milbank quarterly, 99(2). pp. 565-594. 10.1111/1468-0009.12500. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/26132.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Nathan Adam Boucher
Associate Research Professor in the Sanford School of Public Policy
I am a Research Health Scientist at Durham VA Health System’s Center of Innovation
to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT) and Duke University faculty
at Sanford School of Public Policy, the Medical School, and the Nursing School. I
am also a Senior Fellow at the Duke Center for the Study of Aging & Human Development
as well as Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy Core Faculty. I have several leadership
roles at Duke.
I have extensive experience i
Courtney Harold Van Houtven
Professor in Population Health Sciences
Dr. Courtney Van Houtven is a Professor in The Department of Population Health Science,
Duke University School of Medicine and Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy. She
is also a Research Career Scientist in The Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery
and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Dr.
Van Houtven’s aging and economics research interests encompass long-term care financing,
intra-household decision-making, unpaid family and friend car
Alphabetical list of authors with Scholars@Duke profiles.

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator, and subject.
-
Investing in People: Health System Strengthening Through Education
Stoertz, Aaron (2011)Health system strengthening is now recognized as a pressing global health priority. Motivated and productive health workers are a critical component of health systems. Low and middle-income countries need many more health ... -
Spousal concordance in health behavior change.
Falba, TA; Sindelar, JL (Health Serv Res, 2008-02)OBJECTIVE: This study examines the degree to which a married individual's health habits and use of preventive medical care are influenced by his or her spouse's behaviors. STUDY DESIGN: Using longitudinal data on individuals ... -
Economic evaluation of access to musculoskeletal care: the case of waiting for total knee arthroplasty.
Mather, Richard C; Hug, Kevin T; Orlando, Lori A; Watters, Tyler Steven; Koenig, Lane; Nunley, Ryan M; Bolognesi, Michael P (BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2014-01-18)BACKGROUND: The projected demand for total knee arthroplasty is staggering. At its root, the solution involves increasing supply or decreasing demand. Other developed nations have used rationing and wait times to distribute ...