IPMDS-Sponsored Scale Translation Program: Process, Format, and Clinimetric Testing Plan for the MDS-UPDRS and UDysRS
Abstract
We present the methodology and results of the clinimetric testing program for non-English
translations of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (MDS)–sponsored
scales. The programs focus on the MDS revision of the UPDRS (MDS-UPDRS) and the Unified
Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS). The original development teams of both the MDS-UPDRS
and UDysRS envisioned official non-English translations and instituted a rigorous
translation methodology. The formal process includes five core steps: (1) registration
and start-up; (2) translation and independent back-translation; (3) cognitive pretesting
to establish that the translation is clear and that it is comfortably administered
to and completed by native-speaker raters and patients; (4) field testing in the native
language using a large sample of Parkinson's disease patients; and (5) full clinimetric
testing. To date, the MDS-UPDRS has 21 active language programs. Nine official translations
are available, having completed all phases successfully, and the others are in different
stages of development. For the UDysRS, 19 programs are active, with three official
translations now available and the rest in development at different stages. Very few
scales in neurology and none in movement disorders have fully validated translations,
and this model may be adopted or modified by other scale programs to allow careful
validation of translations. Having validated translations allows for maximal homogeneity
of tools utilized in multicenter research or clinical trial programs.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/26140Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1002/mdc3.12023Publication Info
Goetz, Christopher G; Stebbins, Glenn T; Wang, Lu; LaPelle, Nancy R; Luo, Sheng; &
Tilley, Barbara C (2014). IPMDS-Sponsored Scale Translation Program: Process, Format, and Clinimetric Testing
Plan for the MDS-UPDRS and UDysRS. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice, 1(2). pp. 97-101. 10.1002/mdc3.12023. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/26140.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Sheng Luo
Professor of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info