Skip to main content
Duke University Libraries
DukeSpace Scholarship by Duke Authors
  • Login
  • Ask
  • Menu
  • Login
  • Ask a Librarian
  • Search & Find
  • Using the Library
  • Research Support
  • Course Support
  • Libraries
  • About
View Item 
  •   DukeSpace
  • Duke Scholarly Works
  • Research and Writings
  • View Item
  •   DukeSpace
  • Duke Scholarly Works
  • Research and Writings
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Changes in Medical Therapy and Lifestyle After Anatomical Versus Functional Testing for Coronary Artery Disease: The PROMISE Trial (PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain)

Thumbnail
View / Download
623.5 Kb
Date
2015-11-10
Authors
Ladapo, JA
Hoffman, U
Lee, KL
Coles, AL
Huang, M
Mark, DB
Dolor, RL
Pelberg, RA
Budoff, M
Sigurdsson, G
Severance, HW
Douglas, PS
Show More
(12 total)
Repository Usage Stats
22
views
8
downloads
Abstract
Introduction: Diagnostic testing may represent a “teachable moment” for patients newly presenting with symptoms suggestive of CAD and requiring further evaluation, and may influence risk factor management, independent of test results. However, little is known about changes in medications and lifestyle after anatomical versus functional testing. Hypothesis: Patients assigned to coronary CTA will report greater use of preventive medications and lifestyle practices. Methods: We randomly assigned 10,003 symptomatic patients (53% women; mean age 61 yrs) to anatomical testing with CTA or functional testing (exercise ECG, nuclear stress, or stress echocardiography). We assessed use of preventive medications (aspirin, statin, beta blocker, and ACEi/ARB) and lifestyle practices (heart healthy diet, regular exercise, smoking, and obese/overweight status [BMI>25]) at 60 days. Chi-square tests assessed between-group changes (initiation or discontinuation). Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the association between testing strategy and prevalence of medication use or lifestyle practices. Results: There were no differences in medications or lifestyle practices at baseline. At 60 days, the CTA strategy was associated with a higher proportion of patients newly initiating aspirin (11.6% vs 7.6%), statin (12.7% vs 6.2%), and beta blockers (8.2% vs 5.4%), compared to functional testing (p<0.0001 for each). The CTA strategy was also associated with a higher incidence of weight loss among obese/overweight patients (2.8% vs 2.4%), but the difference was not significant (p=0.051). Overall prevalences of aspirin (aOR=1.55), statin (aOR=2.04), and beta blocker (aOR=1.32) use were higher after CTA (p<0.001 for each). Eating a healthy diet (54.7% vs 50.8%) was increased after CTA (aOR=1.13 p=0.004), whereas obese/overweight status was reduced (aOR=0.79 p=0.047). Exercise and smoking cessation increased similarly in both arms. Benefits of CTA for statin use and weight loss persisted after adjusting for test results. Conclusions: Among patients with suspected CAD, anatomical testing is associated with greater favorable changes in preventive medical and lifestyle practices. This may represent a long term benefit of a CTA testing strategy.
Type
Conference
Subject
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
Peripheral Vascular Disease
Cardiovascular System & Cardiology
CT angiography
Stress echocardiography
Cardiovascular disease prevention
Lifestyle
Drugs
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/26206
Collections
  • Research and Writings
More Info
Show full item record

Scholars@Duke

Coles

Adrian Coles

Statistical Scientist
Dolor

Rowena Joy Dolor

Professor of Medicine
Rowena J. Dolor, MD, MHS did her medical training and internal medicine residency at Duke University Medical Center. She completed the Ambulatory Care/Health Services Research fellowship at the Durham VA Medical Center in 1996 and obtained her Masters in Health Sciences degree in Biometry (renamed MHS in Clinical Research) from the Duke University School of Medicine in 1998. Dr. Dolor was a staff physician in the Ambulatory Care Service at the Durham VA Medical Center and Research Associate at t
Douglas

Pamela Susan Douglas

Ursula Geller Distinguished Professor of Research in Cardiovascular Diseases
Pamela S Douglas MD is the Ursula Geller Professor of Research in Cardiovascular Diseases in the Department of Medicine at Duke University and Director of the Multimodality Imaging Program at Duke Clinical Research Institute. During her 30+ years of experience she has led several landmark multicenter government studies and pivotal industry clinical trials along with outcomes research studies.  She is renowned for her scientific and policy work in improving the quality and appropriateness
Lee

Kerry L. Lee

Professor Emeritus of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
As a faculty-level biostatistician, my research activities are focused on the statistical and data coordination aspects of several large multicenter clinical trials, and on statistical issues in the design and analysis of collaborative clinical research projects associated with the Duke University Cardiovascular Disease Database. I am currently the principal investigator of the statistical and data coordinating center for two NIH-sponsored multicenter randomized clinical trials, namely (1) the P
Severance

Harry Wells Severance Jr.

Adjunct Assistant Professor in the Department of Medicine
Site Principle Investigator: PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) prospective, randomized, multi-center clinical trial:Principle Investigator - Duke E.D. Site - "Speed" Study. Pilot phase of Gusto IV. Investigating Abciximab (a GP IIb-IIIa inhibitor) in combination with rapid access to cardiac cath. Funded through Duke Clinical Research Institute. Multi-center trial. Principle Investigator - Project: proposed mechanisms for af
More Authors
Alphabetical list of authors with Scholars@Duke profiles.

Material is made available in this collection at the direction of authors according to their understanding of their rights in that material. You may download and use these materials in any manner not prohibited by copyright or other applicable law.

Rights for Collection: Research and Writings


Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info

Make Your Work Available Here

How to Deposit

Browse

All of DukeSpaceCommunities & CollectionsAuthorsTitlesTypesBy Issue DateDepartmentsAffiliations of Duke Author(s)SubjectsBy Submit DateThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesTypesBy Issue DateDepartmentsAffiliations of Duke Author(s)SubjectsBy Submit Date

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
Duke University Libraries

Contact Us

411 Chapel Drive
Durham, NC 27708
(919) 660-5870
Perkins Library Service Desk

Digital Repositories at Duke

  • Report a problem with the repositories
  • About digital repositories at Duke
  • Accessibility Policy
  • Deaccession and DMCA Takedown Policy

TwitterFacebookYouTubeFlickrInstagramBlogs

Sign Up for Our Newsletter
  • Re-use & Attribution / Privacy
  • Harmful Language Statement
  • Support the Libraries
Duke University