Supplier surfing: Competition and consumer behavior in subscription markets
Abstract
I explore the practice of offering subscribers enticements to switch suppliers. This
type of competition is natural in subscription markets for homogeneous goods and services.
Efficiency is impaired because subscribers are induced to expend resources changing
suppliers. Subscription markets are fully competitive only when three or more firms
serve the industry. In this case, the price offered to switchers is below cost, while
nonswitchers pay a premium. Each firm earns rent on its customer base, but zero expected
profit on each new subscriber it attracts. When firms can track switching behavior,
consumers may change suppliers in order to establish reputations.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/2634Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Curtis R. Taylor
Professor of Economics
Taylor's primary research interest is microeconomic theory with emphasis on the areas
of Industrial Organization, Political Economy, and the Theory of Contracts. He has
worked on a variety of topics such as: the optimal design of research contests, the
causes and timing of market crashes, and consumer privacy. Professor Taylor's research
has been supported by grants from the National
Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the Texas Higher Education
Coordinating Board, am

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info