Abstract
Interest in using ecosystem services to integrate considerations of people and the
environment continues to grow in federal agencies. One method that can help agencies
incorporate ecosystem services into decision making is the use of ecosystem services
conceptual models, which link changes in biophysical systems caused by an intervention
to human well-being outcomes. Evidence-based ecosystem services conceptual models
can provide efficiency and consistency in application, transitioning ecosystem services
from an interesting concept to an actionable approach for natural resource management.
Despite the potential usefulness of these models, there are few examples available
to build from and little published detail on how to implement them. This report provides
an example of an ecosystem services conceptual model for solar energy development
on lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management. The Bureau of Land Management
wants to facilitate solar energy development on suitable land in the southwestern
United States while minimizing negative impacts on social, cultural, and ecological
systems. With agency staff, researchers at Duke's Nicholas Institute for Environmental
Solutions developed a model that captures the potential outcomes of the installation
and operation of solar energy facilities on land managed by the Bureau of Land Management.
An accompanying evidence library provides a summary of the currently available evidence
for each relationship in the model and an assessment of the strength of that evidence.
The ecosystem services conceptual models could improve and help to streamline environmental
assessments and help the Bureau of Land Management achieve its socio-economic strategy.
Material is made available in this collection at the direction of authors according
to their understanding of their rights in that material. You may download and use
these materials in any manner not prohibited by copyright or other applicable law.
Rights for Collection: Research and Writings
Works are deposited here by their authors, and
represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials
and descriptions may include offensive content.
More info