Social Ontology and the Dynamics of Organizational Forms: Creating Market Actors in the Healthcare Field, 1966-1994
Abstract
Social scientists have evidenced a long-standing interest in the cultural construction
of ontologies - symbolic systems of categorization and meaning - but have yet to develop
a widely recognized method for the empirical analysis of this process. Analyzing textual
data from the area of health services research, this article illustrates a general
framework that can be employed to isolate the tacit rules used to structure an ontology
and identify changes in those rules over time. Focusing on the process of market reform
in U.S. healthcare during the last thirty years, this study finds systematic variation
in the dimensions used to differentiate discourse on organizational forms such as
hospitals, health maintenance organizations, and nursing homes. Discourse in the sector
suggests that the symbolic integration of forms along the dimension of accessibility
during the heyday of welfare state policies has given way to symbolic integration
along clinical and functional dimensions with the rise of neoliberal ideologies. These
segregating and blending processes are discussed as a general response to uncertainty
and the desire for ontological security among organizational actors.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/26940Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1093/sf/77.4.1403Publication Info
Ruef, M (1999). Social Ontology and the Dynamics of Organizational Forms: Creating Market Actors in
the Healthcare Field, 1966-1994. Social Forces, 77(4). pp. 1403-1432. 10.1093/sf/77.4.1403. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/26940.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Martin Ruef
Jack and Pamela Egan Distinguished Professor of Entrepreneurship
My research considers the social context of entrepreneurship from both a contemporary
and historical perspective. I draw on large-scale surveys of entrepreneurs in the
United States to explore processes of team formation, innovation, exchange, and boundary
maintenance in nascent business startups. My historical analyses address entrepreneurial
activity and constraint during periods of profound institutional change. This work
has considered a diverse range of sectors, including the organizational

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info