The Cost to Comply: Habitat Conservation Plans under the Endangered Species Act
Abstract
The Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 authorizes U.S. federal government agencies
to save endangered species “whatever the cost,” leaving little flexibility for economic
development. Section 10 was introduced as a controversial attempt to strike a balance
between these competing interests – non-federal stakeholders can develop Habitat Conservation
Plans (HCPs) to minimize the impacts of their development and receive an Incidental
Take Permit. The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) has been investigating the
often-unreported costs associated with these HCPs to better understand the relationship
between species conservation and renewable energy production. Our project explores
new avenues for EPRI’s research by reviewing available data sources and interviewing
EPRI’s expansive membership of energy industry professionals. We outline next steps
including a survey to estimate pre-implementation costs and a streamlined methodology
for future cost analysis.
Type
Master's projectDepartment
Nicholas School of the EnvironmentPermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/27189Citation
Plasynski, Julia; & Keleske, Erin (2023). The Cost to Comply: Habitat Conservation Plans under the Endangered Species Act. Master's project, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/27189.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Nicholas School of the Environment
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info