Timber and Wood Products Trade in India
Abstract
India's efforts to reduce deforestation have resulted in a gap between timber supply
and demand, leading to increased imports of wood products, which can exhaust foreign
exchange. However, trees outside of forests, such as those in agroforestry and farm
forestry, can fulfill increasing demand for wood products. To meet demand with domestic
supply, India passed the 2014 National Agroforestry Policy aimed to encourage the
growth of forest cover and the use of agroforestry, however, the uptake of agroforestry
has been slow. To investigate the reasons for this, we have developed a four-part
approach aimed at understanding the interplay between domestic wood product policies,
markets, and international trade dynamics. Our first step involves a data analysis
to provide an overview of the primary import and export trends in India's wood product
industry. In the second step, we use econometric analysis to identify the historical
drivers of the trade imbalance for major forest products in India. Our third step
involves a literature review to understand how markets and industries in India are
driving farm forestry and agroforestry to provide wood products. Lastly, we conduct
a value chain analysis in three states to examine whether India's comparative advantage
lies in wood production. Our overall goal is to gain insights into the factors that
hinder or facilitate the adoption of agroforestry in India and to identify potential
solutions to increase its uptake.
Type
Master's projectDepartment
Nicholas School of the EnvironmentPermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/27201Citation
Chiappetta, Francesca; & Zhu, Lingqi (2023). Timber and Wood Products Trade in India. Master's project, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/27201.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Nicholas School of the Environment
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info