Abstract
Heat is the leading cause of weather-related death in the United States. Each US state
must have a FEMA-approved state hazard mitigation plan (SHMP) to be eligible for certain
non-emergency disaster funds and funding for mitigation projects. Many US states are
in the process of updating their plans; however, a review of each SHMP as it exists
now reveals the challenge states face in adequately incorporating heat as a hazard.
This report assesses the treatment and definition of heat as a hazard in each state’s
plan. Furthermore, it offers supplemental information for states in parallel with
the latest FEMA guidance for SHMPs that went into effect April 19, 2023.
This analysis found that the importance of extreme heat is often understated in plans.
Only 25 states had a dedicated section for extreme heat, with 18 having heat combined
with cold or drought. Current FEMA guidelines for SHMPs would be strengthened by further
modernization of existing risk identification processes. This is critical for extreme
heat since it is rarely defined by discrete events and is instead chronic and subtle.
The latest FEMA guidance is more specific in requiring climate change to be factored
into hazard identification. However, current state plans do not adequately incorporate
climate change when addressing extreme heat.
This report offers four specific recommendations that provide a roadmap for states
to adequately assess the effects of extreme heat:
⋅ Defining heat as a hazard by combining climate and health outcome data
⋅ Accounting for the hazard-specific vulnerabilities of their population
⋅ Incorporating climate change
⋅ Developing appropriate and feasible mitigation strategies
Material is made available in this collection at the direction of authors according
to their understanding of their rights in that material. You may download and use
these materials in any manner not prohibited by copyright or other applicable law.
Rights for Collection: Research and Writings
Works are deposited here by their authors, and
represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials
and descriptions may include offensive content.
More info