Abstract
Limb deficiency distal to the wrist represents a common presentation, yet a
difficult level to treat with a functional prosthesis. (1) Historically, prosthetic
treatment
has been limited due to the lack of acceptable electric prosthetic options. Poor results
were attributed to challenges including functional limitations of prosthetic technology,
patient discomfort, cosmetics and absence of tactile sensation. (2) Until the late
1990s,
the lack of acceptable electric prosthetic options as well as concise treatment parameters
limited prosthetic treatment. John Michael, M Ed, CPO, FAAOP in the early 90s
precisely described the challenge when stating, “The dilemma facing physicians and
prosthetists is to determine when our admittedly limited prosthetic armamentarium
will
add a measure of function to diminish the substantial loss faced by the partial-hand
amputee.” (3)
As the specialty of upper limb prosthetics realizes the attention of many different
research endeavors, advances in upper limb technology once only found in the research
laboratory or in the minds of idealists are beginning to evolve toward commercial
availability. These current and future additions to the prosthetic field create a
challenge.
With the renewed focus on the partial hand level, variables such as residual limb
presentation, surgical results, and anatomical stability point to the need for concise
treatment parameters.
Citation
Proceedings of the MEC’08 conference, UNB; 2008.
Works are deposited here by their authors, and
represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials
and descriptions may include offensive content.
More info