The effect of posterior polyester tethers on the biomechanics of proximal junctional kyphosis: a finite element analysis.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) remains problematic following multilevel
instrumented spine surgery. Previous biomechanical studies indicate that providing
less rigid fixation at the cranial aspect of a long posterior instrumented construct,
via transition rods or hooks at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV), may provide
a gradual transition to normal motion and prevent PJK. The purpose of this study was
to evaluate the ability of posterior anchored polyethylene tethers to distribute proximal
motion segment stiffness in long instrumented spine constructs. METHODS A finite element
model of a T7-L5 spine segment was created to evaluate range of motion (ROM), intradiscal
pressure, pedicle screw loads, and forces in the posterior ligament complex within
and adjacent to the proximal terminus of an instrumented spine construct. Six models
were tested: 1) intact spine; 2) bilateral, segmental pedicle screws (PS) at all levels
from T-11 through L-5; 3) bilateral pedicle screws from T-12 to L-5 and transverse
process hooks (TPH) at T-11 (the UIV); 4) pedicle screws from T-11 to L5 and 1-level
tethers from T-10 to T-11 (TE-UIV+1); 5) pedicle screws from T-11 to L-5 and 2-level
tethers from T-9 to T-11 (TE-UIV+2); and 6) pedicle screws and 3-level tethers from
T-8 to T-11 (TE-UIV+3). RESULTS Proximal-segment range of motion (ROM) for the PS
construct increased from 16% at UIV-1 to 91% at UIV. Proximal-segment ROM for the
TPH construct increased from 27% at UIV-1 to 92% at UIV. Posterior tether constructs
distributed ROM at the UIV and cranial adjacent segments most effectively; ROM for
TE-UIV+1 was 14% of the intact model at UIV-1, 76% at UIV, and 98% at UIV+1. ROM for
TE-UIV+2 was 10% at UIV-1, 51% at UIV, 69% at UIV+1, and 97% at UIV+2. ROM for TE-UIV+3
was 7% at UIV-1, 33% at UIV, 45% at UIV+1, and 64% at UIV+2. Proximal segment intradiscal
pressures, pedicle screw loads, and ligament forces in the posterior ligament complex
were progressively reduced with increasing number of posterior tethers used. CONCLUSIONS
Finite element analysis of long instrumented spine constructs demonstrated that posterior
tethers created a more gradual transition in ROM and adjacent-segment stress from
the instrumented to the noninstrumented spine compared with all PS and TPH constructs.
Posterior tethers may limit the biomechanical risk factor for PJK; however, further
clinical research is needed to evaluate clinical efficacy.
Type
Journal articleSubject
Longitudinal LigamentsLumbar Vertebrae
Thoracic Vertebrae
Humans
Kyphosis
Range of Motion, Articular
Finite Element Analysis
Pressure
Models, Biological
Stress, Physiological
Biomechanical Phenomena
Pedicle Screws
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/28397Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.3171/2016.6.spine151477Publication Info
Bess, Shay; Harris, Jeffrey E; Turner, Alexander WL; LaFage, Virginie; Smith, Justin
S; Shaffrey, Christopher I; ... Haid, Regis W (2017). The effect of posterior polyester tethers on the biomechanics of proximal junctional
kyphosis: a finite element analysis. Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 26(1). pp. 125-133. 10.3171/2016.6.spine151477. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/28397.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Christopher Ignatius Shaffrey
Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery
I have more than 25 years of experience treating patients of all ages with spinal
disorders. I have had an interest in the management of spinal disorders since starting
my medical education. I performed residencies in both orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery
to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire range of spinal disorders. My
goal has been to find innovative ways to manage the range of spinal conditions, straightforward
to complex. I have a focus on managing patients with complex s

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info