ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Does bone morphogenetic protein increase the incidence of perioperative complications in spinal fusion? A comparison of 55,862 cases of spinal fusion with and without bone morphogenetic protein.
Abstract
<h4>Study design</h4>Retrospective review of a multi-institutional, multisurgeon database.<h4>Objective</h4>Assess
for associations between bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) use and rate of complications
in spinal fusion.<h4>Summary of background data</h4>BMP is commonly used in spinal
surgery to augment fusion; however, there is limited evidence demonstrating its associated
complications.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a retrospective analysis of all fusion
cases submitted by members of the Scoliosis Research Society from 2004 to 2007. We
stratified on the basis of the use of BMP and evaluated for complications and associated
characteristics.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 55,862 cases of spinal fusion were identified
with BMP used in 21% (11,933) of the cases. Excluding anterior cervical fusions, there
were no significant differences between fusions with and without BMP with regard to
overall complications (8.4% vs. 8.5%; P = 0.5), wound infections (2.4% vs. 2.4%; P
= 0.8), or epidural hematomas/seromas (0.2% vs. 0.2%; P = 0.3). Anterior cervical
fusions with BMP were associated with more overall complications (5.8% vs. 2.4%; P
< 0.001) and more wound infections (2.1% vs. 0.4%; P < 0.001) than fusions without
BMP. On multivariate analysis for thoracolumbar and posterior cervical fusions, BMP
use was not a significant predictor of complications (P = 0.334; odds ratio = 1.039;
95% confidence interval = 0.961-1.124; covariates were BMP use, patient age, revision
vs. primary surgery). Multivariate analysis for anterior cervical spinal fusion demonstrated
that BMP use remained a significant predictor of complications (P < 0.001, odds ratio
= 1.6; 95% confidence interval = 1.516-1.721), after adjusting for the effects of
patient age and whether the surgery was a revision procedure.<h4>Conclusion</h4>BMP
use with anterior cervical fusion was associated with an increased incidence of complications.
Use of BMP was not associated with more complications in thoracolumbar and posterior
cervical fusions.
Type
Journal articleSubject
Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality CommitteeHumans
Spinal Diseases
Postoperative Complications
Bone Morphogenetic Proteins
Spinal Fusion
Incidence
Retrospective Studies
Bone Regeneration
Databases, Factual
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Middle Aged
Societies, Medical
Young Adult
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/29229Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1097/brs.0b013e318216d825Publication Info
Williams, Brian J; Smith, Justin S; Fu, Kai-Ming G; Hamilton, D Kojo; Polly, David
W; Ames, Christopher P; ... Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee (2011). Does bone morphogenetic protein increase the incidence of perioperative complications
in spinal fusion? A comparison of 55,862 cases of spinal fusion with and without bone
morphogenetic protein. Spine, 36(20). pp. 1685-1691. 10.1097/brs.0b013e318216d825. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/29229.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Christopher Ignatius Shaffrey
Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery
I have more than 25 years of experience treating patients of all ages with spinal
disorders. I have had an interest in the management of spinal disorders since starting
my medical education. I performed residencies in both orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery
to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire range of spinal disorders. My
goal has been to find innovative ways to manage the range of spinal conditions, straightforward
to complex. I have a focus on managing patients with complex s

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info