Ensuring Healthy Children: The Effect of Health Insurance on Primary Health Care for Children
Abstract
Background Past studies have typically focused on the effect of health insurance
on primary health care for children, but few have assessed the effect the type of
health insurance coverage has on primary care. This research studied the effect of
health insurance status—uninsured, private insurance, public coverage, or other insurance—on
the accessibility, continuity, and comprehensiveness of primary health care for children.
Methods This research analyzed a sample of 39,225 children under 18 years of age
from the 2006-2009 National Health Interview Survey, a nationally representative sample
of households in the United States. The response rate for children was 75.2 percent.
Logistic regression models were used to analyze the effect of health insurance on
health status and three aspects of primary care: accessibility (physician visit; usual
source of care; time since health professional visit), continuity, (usual source and
site of care), and comprehensiveness (physical). Excellent or very good health status
was the final dependent variable.
Results Compared to children with private health insurance, uninsured children and
Medicaid or State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) beneficiaries are 27%
(p<0.001) and 89.4% (p<0.01) as likely, respectively, to have visited a physician
within the last twelve months (LTM). Approximately 73% of uninsured children reported
having a usual source of care, compared to 96% of children with private insurance
and 98% of Medicaid/SCHIP beneficiaries. Children with private health insurance are
at least twice as likely to report “excellent or very good” health as children with
any other health insurance status (p<0.001). After controlling for the confounding
effects of age, citizenship, mother’s education, father’s education, health status,
poverty status, race/ethnicity, and region, Medicaid/SCHIP coverage is associated
with similar, if not better, accessibility, continuity, and comprehensiveness of primary
care compared to children with private insurance.
Conclusions Although by many indicators Medicaid and SCHIP enrollees have worse primary
care than children with private health insurance, Medicaid and SCHIP beneficiaries
are more likely to have risk factors that are associated with poorer primary care
and poorer child health status. Nevertheless, clear relationships cannot be established
to conclude how government health insurance programs perform relative to private insurance.
Health insurance status is an important predictor, but not the only predictor, of
the accessibility, continuity, and comprehensiveness of primary care. Other important
risk factors include adolescence, non-U.S. citizenship, low levels of mother’s education,
poverty, and residence in the West or South.
Type
Honors thesisDepartment
Public Policy StudiesPermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/3163Citation
Sanderson, Anthony (2010). Ensuring Healthy Children: The Effect of Health Insurance on Primary Health Care for
Children. Honors thesis, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/3163.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Undergraduate Honors Theses and Student papers
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info