Attempting Education Reform through the Courts: The Inefficacy of Abbott V Court-Mandated Funding Reallocation and Reforms in Underperforming School Districts in New Jersey
Abstract
This research project analyzes the effects of the 1998 Abbott V New Jersey Supreme
Court decision on student achievement in the state’s underperforming Abbott districts.
The Court mandated the reallocation of the districts’ state aid to best practice reforms.
This project uses regression analysis to compare the Abbott districts to socioeconomically
similar districts in New Jersey while controlling for the confounding factors of each
district’s Black student percentage, Hispanic student percentage, socioeconomic status,
and expenditure per pupil. The results show that Abbott V had no effect on fourth
grade achievement between 2004 and 2007 and lowered achievement growth for cohorts
of students who entered fourth grade in 2004 and 2005. The results hold for both language
arts and math achievement measured both as district proficiency rate and district
average score. The project concludes that Abbott V was not effective in increasing
student achievement and that the state was justified in eliminating the Abbott district
system under the School Funding Reform Act of 2008.
Description
Senior Honors Thesis for Public Policy Studies
Type
Honors thesisDepartment
Public Policy StudiesPermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/3185Citation
Song, Kevin (2010). Attempting Education Reform through the Courts: The Inefficacy of Abbott V Court-Mandated
Funding Reallocation and Reforms in Underperforming School Districts in New Jersey.
Honors thesis, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/3185.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Undergraduate Honors Theses and Student papers
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info