Show simple item record Abdulkadiroǧlu, A Pathak, PA Roth, AE 2011-04-15T16:46:16Z 2009-12-01
dc.identifier.citation American Economic Review, 2009, 99 (5), pp. 1954 - 1978
dc.identifier.issn 0002-8282
dc.description.abstract The design of the New York City (NYC) high school match involved trade-offs among efficiency, stability, and strategy-proofness that raise new theoretical questions. We analyze a model with indifferences-ties-in school preferences. Simulations with field data and the theory favor breaking indifferences the same way at every school-single tiebreaking-in a student-proposing deferred acceptance mechanism. Any inefficiency associated with a realized tiebreaking cannot be removed without harming student incentives. Finally, we empirically document the extent of potential efficiency loss associated with strategy-proofness and stability, and direct attention to some open questions. (JEL C78, D82, I21).
dc.format.extent 1954 - 1978
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.relation.ispartof American Economic Review
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1257/aer.99.5.1954
dc.title Strategy-proofness versus Efficiency in Matching with Indifferences: Redesigning the NYC High School Match
dc.type Journal Article
dc.description.version Version of Record en_US 2009-12-0 en_US
duke.description.endpage 1978 en_US
duke.description.issue 5 en_US
duke.description.startpage 1954 en_US
duke.description.volume 99 en_US
dc.relation.journal American Economic Review en_US
pubs.issue 5
pubs.organisational-group /Duke
pubs.organisational-group /Duke/Trinity College of Arts & Sciences
pubs.organisational-group /Duke/Trinity College of Arts & Sciences/Economics
pubs.publication-status Published
pubs.volume 99

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record