Can metaphors and analogies improve communication with seriously ill patients?
Repository Usage Stats
OBJECTIVE: It is not known how often physicians use metaphors and analogies, or whether they improve patients' perceptions of their physicians' ability to communicate effectively. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine whether the use of metaphors and analogies in difficult conversations is associated with better patient ratings of their physicians' communication skills. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study of audio-recorded conversations between patients and physicians. SETTING: Three outpatient oncology practices. PATIENTS: Ninety-four patients with advanced cancer and 52 physicians. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Conversations were reviewed and coded for the presence of metaphors and analogies. Patients also completed a 6-item rating of their physician's ability to communicate. RESULTS: In a sample of 101 conversations, coders identified 193 metaphors and 75 analogies. Metaphors appeared in approximately twice as many conversations as analogies did (65/101, 64% versus 31/101, 31%; sign test p < 0.001). Conversations also contained more metaphors than analogies (mean 1.6, range 0-11 versus mean 0.6, range 0-5; sign rank test p < 0.001). Physicians who used more metaphors elicited better patient ratings of communication (rho = 0.27; p = 0.006), as did physicians who used more analogies (Spearman rho = 0.34; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of metaphors and analogies may enhance physicians' ability to communicate.
Aged, 80 and over
Published Version (Please cite this version)10.1089/jpm.2009.0221
Publication InfoCasarett, David; Pickard, Amy; Fishman, Jessica M; Alexander, Stewart C; Arnold, Robert M; Pollak, Kathryn I; & Tulsky, James A (2010). Can metaphors and analogies improve communication with seriously ill patients?. J Palliat Med, 13(3). pp. 255-260. 10.1089/jpm.2009.0221. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/3369.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
More InfoShow full item record
Professor in Population Health Sciences
Dr. Pollak is a social psychologist who designs and tests behavioral interventions to promote smoking cessation, reduce health disparities, and improve clinician-patient communication. She also is one of the heads of the Palliative Care Research Cooperative that supports multi-site palliative care trials. Finally, Dr. Pollak serves as a Communication Coach where she teaches clinicians effective communication techniques.Area of expertise: Health Behavior
Adjunct Professor in the Department of Medicine
Dr. Tulsky is Professor of Medicine and Nursing, and Chief, Duke Palliative Care. His primary research interests are palliative care and provider-patient communication. He uses quantitative and qualitative methods to analyze audio-recorded medical encounters, assess quality of life at the end of life, study trajectories of patient experience, and evaluate interventions to improve the care of patients with advanced serious illness. Past projects include studies of audiorec
This author no longer has a Scholars@Duke profile, so the information shown here reflects their Duke status at the time this item was deposited.
Alphabetical list of authors with Scholars@Duke profiles.