Show simple item record

Knowledge-based IMRT treatment planning for prostate cancer.

dc.contributor.advisor Lo, Joseph Y
dc.contributor.advisor Das, Shiva K
dc.contributor.advisor Tourassi, Georgia
dc.contributor.advisor Turkington, Timothy
dc.contributor.author Chanyavanich, Vorakarn
dc.coverage.spatial United States
dc.date.accessioned 2011-05-20T19:35:48Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10161/3879
dc.description.abstract The goal of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plan optimization is to produce a cumulative dose distribution that satisfies both the dose prescription and the normal tissue dose constraints. The typical manual treatment planning process is iterative, time consuming, and highly dependent on the skill and experience of the planner. We have addressed this problem by developing a knowledge based approach that utilizes a database of prior plans to leverage the planning expertise of physicians and physicists at our institution. We developed a case-similarity algorithm that uses mutual information to identify a similar matched case for a given query case, and various treatment parameters from the matched case are then adapted to derive new treatment plans that are patient specific. We used 10 randomly selected cases matched against a knowledge base of 100 cases to demonstrate that new, clinically acceptable IMRT treatment plans can be developed. This approach substantially reduced planning time by skipping all but the last few iterations of the optimization process. Additionally, we established a simple metric based on the areas under the curve (AUC) of the dose volume histogram (DVH), specifically for the planning target volume (PTV), rectum, and bladder. This plan quality metric was used to successfully rank order the plan quality of a collection of knowledgebased plans. Further, we used 100 pre-optimized plans (20 query x 5 matches) to show that the average normalized MI score can be used as a surrogate of overall plan quality. Plans of lower pre-optimized plan quality tended to improve substantially after optimization, though its final plan quality did not improve to the same level as a plan that has a higher pre-optimized plan quality to begin with. Optimization usually improved PTV coverage slightly while providing substantial dose sparing for both bladder and rectum of 12.4% and 9.1% respectively. Lastly, we developed new treatment plans for cases selected from an outside institution matched against our sitespecific database. The knowledge-based plans are very comparable to the original manual plan, providing adequate PTV coverage as well as substantial improvement in dose sparing to the rectum and bladder. In conclusion, we found that a site-specific database of prior plans can be effectively used to design new treatment plans for our own institution as well as outside cases. Specifically, knowledge-based plans can provide clinically acceptable planning target volume coverage and clinically acceptable dose sparing to the rectum and bladder. This approach has been demonstrated to improve the efficiency of the treatment planning process, and may potentially improve the quality of patient care by enabling more consistent treatment planning across institutions.
dc.language eng
dc.subject Artificial Intelligence
dc.subject Decision Support Systems, Clinical
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Knowledge Bases
dc.subject Male
dc.subject Prostatic Neoplasms
dc.subject Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
dc.subject Radiotherapy, Conformal
dc.subject Retrospective Studies
dc.subject Therapy, Computer-Assisted
dc.subject Treatment Outcome
dc.title Knowledge-based IMRT treatment planning for prostate cancer.
dc.type Dissertation
dc.department Medical Physics
duke.embargo.months 6
pubs.organisational-group Duke
pubs.organisational-group Duke
pubs.organisational-group Pratt School of Engineering
pubs.organisational-group Duke
pubs.organisational-group Pratt School of Engineering
pubs.organisational-group Biomedical Engineering
pubs.organisational-group Duke
pubs.organisational-group School of Medicine
pubs.organisational-group Duke
pubs.organisational-group School of Medicine
pubs.organisational-group Clinical Science Departments
pubs.organisational-group Duke
pubs.organisational-group School of Medicine
pubs.organisational-group Clinical Science Departments
pubs.organisational-group Radiation Oncology
pubs.organisational-group Duke
pubs.organisational-group School of Medicine
pubs.organisational-group Clinical Science Departments
pubs.organisational-group Radiology
pubs.organisational-group Duke
pubs.organisational-group School of Medicine
pubs.organisational-group Clinical Science Departments
pubs.organisational-group Surgery
pubs.organisational-group Duke
pubs.organisational-group School of Medicine
pubs.organisational-group Clinical Science Departments
pubs.organisational-group Surgery
pubs.organisational-group Surgery, Urology
pubs.organisational-group Duke
pubs.organisational-group School of Medicine
pubs.organisational-group Institutes and Centers
pubs.organisational-group Duke
pubs.organisational-group School of Medicine
pubs.organisational-group Institutes and Centers
pubs.organisational-group Duke Cancer Institute
pubs.publication-status Published


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record