Glucose-responsive polymer brushes for microcantilever sensing
Abstract
Glucose responsive polymer brushes were synthesized on gold substrates and microcantilever
arrays. The response properties of these brushes were evaluated by exposing them to
different glucose concentrations for a range of pH values. This work demonstrates
the potential for polymer brush-functionalized micromechanical cantilevers as glucose
detectors. Furthermore, the work demonstrates that stimulus-responsive polymer brushes
on micromechanical cantilevers have a significantly larger bending response due to
glucose binding compared with self-assembled monolayers. © The Royal Society of Chemistry
2010.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/4121Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1039/b925583dPublication Info
(2010). Glucose-responsive polymer brushes for microcantilever sensing. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 20(17). pp. 3391-3395. 10.1039/b925583d. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/4121.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Stefan Zauscher
Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science
My research lies at the intersection of surface and colloid science, polymer materials
engineering, and biointerface science, with four central areas of focus:
1. Fabrication, manipulation and characterization of stimulus-responsive biomolecular
and bio-inspired polymeric nanostructures on surfaces;
2. Nanotechnology of soft-wet materials and hybrid biological/non-biological microdevices;
3. Receptor-ligand interactions relevant to the diagnostics of infectious diseases;
4. Friction
Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info