Abstract
Dynamic voltage scaling (DVS) has been widely adopted in multicore SoCs for reducing
dynamic power consumption. Despite its benefits, the use of DVS increases test time
because high product quality can only be ensured by testing every core at multiple
supported voltage settings; hence the repetitive application of the same or different
tests at multiple voltage settings becomes necessary. In addition, testing at lower
supply voltage settings increases considerably the length of each test because lower
scan frequencies must be used for shifting test data using scan chains. Standard scheduling
techniques fail to reduce the test time for DVS-based SoCs since they do not model
testing at multiple voltage settings. In addition, they do not consider the practical
aspects of tester overhead and the dependencies between core voltage settings due
to the use of voltage islands. To alleviate the detrimental impact of DVS on test
application time, we propose a time-division multiplexing (TDM) method and an integer
linear programming-based test scheduling technique, which exploit high automatic test
equipment (ATE) frequencies even when low shift frequencies must be used at low voltage
settings. Experimental results on two industrial SoCs highlight the effectiveness
of TDM and the associated scheduling method. © 2012 IEEE.
Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1109/ETS.2012.6233019
Publication Info
Kavousianos, X; Chakrabarty, K; Jain, A; & Parekhji, R (2012). Time-division multiplexing for testing SoCs with DVS and multiple voltage islands.
Proceedings - 2012 17th IEEE European Test Symposium, ETS 2012.
10.1109/ETS.2012.6233019.
Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/5120.
Material is made available in this collection at the direction of authors according
to their understanding of their rights in that material. You may download and use
these materials in any manner not prohibited by copyright or other applicable law.
Rights for Collection: Research and Writings
Works are deposited here by their authors, and
represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials
and descriptions may include offensive content.
More info