ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Exploring Strategies to Address the Prevalence of Islamophobia in America
Abstract
9/11 marked a notable rise in Islamophobia within American society that has since
remained a prevailing reality. For the purposes of this paper, I define Islamophobia
as a negative bias against Islam and/or Muslims expressed as hostile and discriminatory
perceptions, sentiments, attitudes, and behavior towards Muslims and those perceived
to be Muslim - including Sikhs, Arabs and South Asian Americans. Questioning, disagreeing
with or critically analyzing Islam or Muslims is not necessarily Islamophobic. Just
as Americans are not labeled anti-American for critiquing U.S. policies, those who
critique Islam or Muslims should also not be automatically labeled as Islamophobes.
The prevalence of Islamophobia is problematic because it threatens the wellbeing of
its targets, the Islamophobes themselves and American society as a whole. To Muslims
and others perceived to be Muslim, Islamophobia can ultimately motivate physical damage
against their property and their actual person. As a type of prejudice, Islamophobia
also threatens to restrict its targets’ “self image, educational success, occupational
attainment, mental health status and health status.” A 2010 study confirms some of
these effects by revealing that perceived Islamophobia-motivated “abuse and discrimination”
is associated with “increased psychological distress, reduced levels of happiness
and worse health status.” To Islamophobes, similar to the impact of racism on racists,
Islamophobia could ultimately hinder Islamophobes’ ability to work effectively in
pluralistic settings and could lead to “lower self-esteem and higher levels of anxiety.”
As for society as a whole, Islamophobia erodes national unity, signals a departure
from our nation’s core value of epluribus unum, and has the potential, as a form of
prejudice, to spur mass murder and terrorism. Anders Breivik, the Norwegian terrorist
who intended to “save Europe from Marxism and ‘Muslimization,’” stands as proof of
Islamophobia’s terrorism potential. Islamophobia may also enable extremist groups
like the Taliban and Al Qaeda to recruit and carry out terrorist attacks for two reasons.
First, Islamophobia can result in the isolation and marginalization of its targets,
which can leave them vulnerable and receptive to radicalization. Second, Islamophobia
perpetuates the notion that the West is at war with Islam, which is a recruitment
tactic used by such groups.
The client for this Master’s project is the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC),
a policy advocacy nonprofit for the Muslim American community. MPAC is interested
in knowing the possible range of efforts that should be taken to prevent future backlash
- against Muslims and those perceived to be Muslim - if another domestic terrorist
attack is implemented by a self-described Muslim. This paper explores possible strategies
that have the potential to effectively reduce the current Islamophobia trend and minimize
possible future resurgence: What efforts are feasible and sustainable with respect
to curbing Islamophobia among the American public?
This paper begins with an examination of the nature of the post-9/11 prevalence of
Islamophobia in America, specifically how and to what extent it has manifested along
with what factors are cited as sources behind of the Islamophobia trend. Next, the
methodology section details the analytical strategy used to identify possible strategies.
A menu of strategy options is then presented through the lens of a set of evaluative
criteria. This paper ultimately concludes with a discussion on next steps in addressing
Islamophobia in America.
This project has relevant implications for a range of actors across society, including
but not limited to: 1) policymakers who seek to maximize social welfare; 2) civil
rights advocates across religious, racial, and ethnic minority communities who seek
to combat bigotry; and 3) interfaith movements and organizations that seek to promote
tolerance. This paper does not intend to present the ultimate, static solution to
Islamophobia. Instead, the paper seeks to 1) identify possible strategies towards
addressing Islamophobia in America and 2) contribute a foundation for which societal
problems like Islamophobia can begin to be addressed in an organized and strategic
manner.
Type
Master's projectDepartment
The Sanford School of Public PolicyPermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/5358Citation
Acosta-Licea, Dulce Maria (2012). Exploring Strategies to Address the Prevalence of Islamophobia in America. Master's project, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/5358.More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Sanford School Master of Public Policy (MPP) Program Master’s Projects
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info