Show simple item record

What We Owe the Global Poor: In Defense of a Moderate Principle of Sacrifice

dc.contributor.advisor Flanagan, Owen J
dc.contributor.author Robson, Gregory J.
dc.date.accessioned 2012-05-25T20:15:51Z
dc.date.available 2017-05-20T04:30:03Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10161/5506
dc.description.abstract <p>Peter Singer's 1971 essay "Famine, Affluence, and Morality" sparked a surge in interest among philosophers in the beneficent obligations of the global rich to assist the global poor. Richard Miller, a prominent recent critic of Singer, has argued that Singer's position is too demanding and proposed the Principle of Sympathy as an alternative to Singer's Principle of Sacrifice. I argue against Miller's view and highlight problematic features of his "daughter's aesthetic sense" example and his "closeness-to-heart" criterion. After critically examining Miller's and Singer's alternative accounts, I argue for a substantially revised version of Singer's position. The Moderate Principle of Sacrifice (MPS) that I propose includes four revisions to Singer's account. These revisions allow it more plausibly to capture our beneficent obligations to assist the global poor.</p>
dc.subject Philosophy
dc.subject Ethics
dc.subject International relations
dc.subject aid
dc.subject assistance
dc.subject beneficence
dc.subject Miller
dc.subject poverty
dc.subject Singer
dc.title What We Owe the Global Poor: In Defense of a Moderate Principle of Sacrifice
dc.type Master's thesis
dc.department Philosophy
duke.embargo.months 60


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record