Arendt in crisis: Political thought in between past and future
Abstract
For Hannah Arendt, a crisis occurs when we can no longer rely on the prejudices that
ordinarily guide us through the world. Every crisis is, therefore, an occasion to
reflect upon tradition. By eroding our shared background beliefe, however, the crisis
also weakens our ability to communicate and cooperate with each other. The crisis
thus confronts us with the question of what community is possible when we do not have
anything in common. Arendt's own answer is found in the community of judgment. Insofar
as reflective judgments involve soliciting the potential agreement of others, they
confirm that some common ground remains despite the loss of shared prejudices. Indeed,
only when we cannot take consensus for granted are we truly attentive to others. By
focusing on the tenuous togetherness of crisis, Arendt's work shows us that groups
supported by shared values, traditions, and purposes are not necessarily political
in nature.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/5919Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Jakob Norberg
Professor of German Studies
Jakob Norberg’s research explores conceptions of community in German thought and literature.
His first book, Sociability and Its Enemies (Northwestern 2014), examines the search
for non-authoritarian forms of collective life after the end of the Second World War
and focuses on thinkers such as Hannah Arendt, Carl Schmitt, and Jürgen Habermas.
The second book, The Brothers Grimm and the Making of German Nationalism (Cambridge
2022), shows how Jacob and Wil

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info