Indian Toilets and Tanzanian Mosquito Nets: Understanding Households' Environmental Health Decisions in Developing Countries
Abstract
Diarrhea and malaria are two of the most devastating public health threats in the
developing world, resulting in millions of childhood deaths each year. Part of the
challenge in addressing these threats arises from the fact that many of the causes
of and potential remedies for these diseases lie squarely at the intersection of environment,
development, and health. In addition, while many environmental, economic, and health-related
policies focus on expanding access to new technologies (e.g., latrines, mosquito nets),
inadequate attention to factors that affect the use of these technologies often leads
to disappointing policy outcomes.
This dissertation applies an economic framework to explore the drivers of households'
environmental health decisions in two specific contexts. The first study examines
sanitation behaviors and child health outcomes in Orissa, India, while the second
case involves malaria-related knowledge, prevention, and treatment behaviors in Mvomero,
Tanzania. In both cases, theoretical models are developed that focus on the perceived
costs and benefits households consider in their decisions to adopt certain behaviors.
A key insight is that technologies targeting diarrhea and malaria have characteristics
of both private and public goods. For both epidemiological and social reasons, the
payoffs to adopting behavior changes such as using a latrine or a mosquito net will
depend in part on the behavior of other households in the village or neighborhood.
This motivates an examination of the role of social networks and social interactions
in influencing households' environmental health choices in both empirical studies.
The first empirical case involves a study of a randomized community-level sanitation
intervention in Orissa, India. Household survey data were collected before and after
the sanitation campaign in 1050 households in 40 rural villages. Impact evaluation
analyses indicate that the campaign resulted in large increases in latrine use in
the randomly selected "treatment" villages. In addition, some analyses suggest that
child health outcomes may have improved as a result of the campaign. To examine the
drivers of the observed behavior change, econometric models are run including household
and village characteristics as well as indicators of social interactions. Results
indicate that households were more likely to adopt latrines when they observed more
adoption among their peers. Thus, part of the sanitation campaign's success was likely
due to its emphasis on targeting villages rather than individuals and strengthening
social pressure to adopt latrines.
The second empirical case examines indicators of households' malaria-related knowledge,
prevention, and treatment behaviors in Mvomero, Tanzania. Survey data from 408 households
in 10 villages shed light on a number of malaria control behaviors, including use
of bed nets and anti-malarial medications. Findings suggest that the majority of
households (over 80%) in this area own and use mosquito nets. At the same time, malaria
continues to impose a significant burden on the study population. Data collected
in Mvomero also provide unique information on the patterns of social interaction among
households within and across different villages, and additional analyses explore the
role of social interactions in influencing households' malaria-related decisions.
Results suggest that patterns of interaction are influenced by a number of factors,
including physical proximity as well as tribe, religion, and wealth. In addition,
social effects may play an important role in influencing households' malaria prevention
and treatment decisions.
Together, these studies help to shed light on the ways households perceive and respond
to two specific environmental health threats. More generally, this study illustrates
the potential benefits of applying economic tools and analyses to problems like sanitation
and malaria, and expanding the definition of "environmental problems" beyond the typical
set of first-world issues (e.g., industrial pollution) to include these pressing issues
facing the world's most vulnerable populations.
Type
DissertationDepartment
EnvironmentSubject
Economics, GeneralEnvironmental Sciences
Health Sciences, Public Health
environmental economics
global health
economic development
malaria
sanitation
household decision making
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/593Citation
Dickinson, Katherine Lee (2008). Indian Toilets and Tanzanian Mosquito Nets: Understanding Households' Environmental
Health Decisions in Developing Countries. Dissertation, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/593.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Duke Dissertations
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info