Skip to main content
Duke University Libraries
DukeSpace Scholarship by Duke Authors
  • Login
  • Ask
  • Menu
  • Login
  • Ask a Librarian
  • Search & Find
  • Using the Library
  • Research Support
  • Course Support
  • Libraries
  • About
View Item 
  •   DukeSpace
  • Duke Scholarly Works
  • Scholarly Articles
  • View Item
  •   DukeSpace
  • Duke Scholarly Works
  • Scholarly Articles
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Positive and negative artifacts in particulate organic carbon measurements with denuded and undenuded sampler configurations

Thumbnail
View / Download
753.3 Kb
Date
2004-05-01
Authors
Subramanian, R
Khlystov, AY
Cabada, JC
Robinson, AL
Repository Usage Stats
584
views
1,263
downloads
Abstract
Measurement of ambient particulate organic carbon (POC) with quartz filters is prone to positive and negative sampling artifacts. One approach for estimating these artifacts is to sample with a backup quartz filter placed behind either the main quartz filter or a Teflon filter in a parallel line. Another approach is to use a denuder to reduce the positive artifact in combination with a highly adsorbent backup filter to capture any negative artifact. Results obtained using both of these approaches in parallel for over one year in Pittsburgh, PA are presented in this article. A sampler using an activated carbon monolith denuder has been developed and tested extensively. Transmission losses were found to be negligible, and the denuder is on average 94% efficient at removing gas-phase organics. Denuder breakthrough is corrected for each run using a dynamic blank in parallel with the sample line. Comparisons with the dynamic blank indicate that the denuder almost eliminates the positive artifact on the quartz filter. Negative artifact from the denuded quartz filter is quantified using a carbon-impregnated glass fiber (CIG) backup filter and was found to be small, typically less than 10% of the ambient POC. Compared to the denuded sampler POC, 24 h bare quartz samples showed an almost constant positive artifact of 0.5 μg-C/m3 for samples taken throughout the year-long study period. Sampling for shorter durations (4-6 h) resulted in a larger positive artifact. A quartz filter behind a Teflon filter (QBT) provides a consistent estimate of the positive artifact on the bare quartz filter irrespective of sample duration, though it overcorrects for the positive artifact by 16-20% (attributed to particulate matter volatilizing off the upstream Teflon filter). The quartz behind quartz (QBQ) approach provides a reasonable estimate of the positive artifact on the bare quartz filter for the 24 h samples but not for the shorter samples. A slight seasonal variation is observed in the absolute value of the positive artifact, with higher values observed during the summer months.
Type
Journal article
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/6431
Collections
  • Scholarly Articles
More Info
Show full item record
Open Access

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy

Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles


Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info

Make Your Work Available Here

How to Deposit

Browse

All of DukeSpaceCommunities & CollectionsAuthorsTitlesTypesBy Issue DateDepartmentsAffiliations of Duke Author(s)SubjectsBy Submit DateThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesTypesBy Issue DateDepartmentsAffiliations of Duke Author(s)SubjectsBy Submit Date

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
Duke University Libraries

Contact Us

411 Chapel Drive
Durham, NC 27708
(919) 660-5870
Perkins Library Service Desk

Digital Repositories at Duke

  • Report a problem with the repositories
  • About digital repositories at Duke
  • Accessibility Policy
  • Deaccession and DMCA Takedown Policy

TwitterFacebookYouTubeFlickrInstagramBlogs

Sign Up for Our Newsletter
  • Re-use & Attribution / Privacy
  • Harmful Language Statement
  • Support the Libraries
Duke University