ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Cost of innovation in the pharmaceutical industry.
Abstract
The research and development costs of 93 randomly selected new chemical entities (NCEs)
were obtained from a survey of 12 U.S.-owned pharmaceutical firms. These data were
used to estimate the pre-tax average cost of new drug development. The costs of abandoned
NCEs were linked to the costs of NCEs that obtained marketing approval. For base case
parameter values, the estimated out-of-pocket cost per approved NCE is $114 million
(1987 dollars). Capitalizing out-of-pocket costs to the point of marketing approval
at a 9% discount rate yielded an average cost estimate of $231 million (1987 dollars).
Type
Journal articleSubject
Costs and Cost AnalysisData Collection
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Drug Evaluation
Drug Evaluation, Preclinical
Drug Industry
Humans
United States
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/6466Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Henry G. Grabowski
Professor Emeritus of Economics
Professor Grabowski specializes in the investigation of economics in the pharmaceutical
industry, government regulation of business, and the economics of innovation. His
specific interests within these fields include intellectual property and generic competition
issues, the effects of government policy actions, and the costs and returns to pharmaceutical
R&D. He has over one hundred peer reviewed articles analyzing the economics of pharmaceuticals
and also several books and monograph publica

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info