ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
The cost of biopharmaceutical R&D: Is biotech different?
Abstract
The costs of developing the types of new drugs that have been pursued by traditional
pharmaceutical firms have been estimated in a number of studies. However, similar
analyses have not been published on the costs of developing the types of molecules
on which biotech firms have focused. This study represents a first attempt to get
a sense for the magnitude of the R&D costs associated with the discovery and development
of new therapeutic biopharmaceuticals (specifically, recombinant proteins and monoclonal
antibodies [mAbs]). We utilize drug-specific data on cash outlays, development times,
and success in obtaining regulatory marketing approval to estimate the average pre-tax
R&D resource cost for biopharmaceuticals up to the point of initial US marketing approval
(in year 2005 dollars). We found average out-of-pocket (cash outlay) cost estimates
per approved biopharmaceutical of $198 million, $361 million, and $559 million for
the preclinical period, the clinical period, and in total, respectively. Including
the time costs associated with biopharmaceutical R&D, we found average capitalized
cost estimates per approved biopharmaceutical of $615 million, $626 million, and $1241
million for the preclinical period, the clinical period, and in total, respectively.
Adjusting previously published estimates of R&D costs for traditional pharmaceutical
firms by using past growth rates for pharmaceutical company costs to correspond to
the more recent period to which our biopharmaceutical data apply, we found that total
out-of-pocket cost per approved biopharmaceutical was somewhat lower than for the
pharmaceutical company data ($559 million vs $672 million). However, estimated total
capitalized cost per approved new molecule was nearly the same for biopharmaceuticals
as for the adjusted pharmaceutical company data ($1241 million versus $1318 million).
The results should be viewed with some caution for now given a limited number of biopharmaceutical
molecules with data on cash outlays, different therapeutic class distributions for
biopharmaceuticals and for pharmaceutical company drugs, and uncertainty about whether
recent growth rates in pharmaceutical company costs are different from immediate past
growth rates. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/6478Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1002/mde.1360Publication Info
Dimasi, JA; & Grabowski, HG (2007). The cost of biopharmaceutical R&D: Is biotech different?. Managerial and Decision Economics, 28(4-5). pp. 469-479. 10.1002/mde.1360. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/6478.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Henry G. Grabowski
Professor Emeritus of Economics
Professor Grabowski specializes in the investigation of economics in the pharmaceutical
industry, government regulation of business, and the economics of innovation. His
specific interests within these fields include intellectual property and generic competition
issues, the effects of government policy actions, and the costs and returns to pharmaceutical
R&D. He has over one hundred peer reviewed articles analyzing the economics of pharmaceuticals
and also several books and monograph publica

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info