Lack of cross-scale linkages reduces robustness of community-based fisheries management.
Abstract
Community-based management and the establishment of marine reserves have been advocated
worldwide as means to overcome overexploitation of fisheries. Yet, researchers and
managers are divided regarding the effectiveness of these measures. The "tragedy of
the commons" model is often accepted as a universal paradigm, which assumes that unless
managed by the State or privatized, common-pool resources are inevitably overexploited
due to conflicts between the self-interest of individuals and the goals of a group
as a whole. Under this paradigm, the emergence and maintenance of effective community-based
efforts that include cooperative risky decisions as the establishment of marine reserves
could not occur. In this paper, we question these assumptions and show that outcomes
of commons dilemmas can be complex and scale-dependent. We studied the evolution and
effectiveness of a community-based management effort to establish, monitor, and enforce
a marine reserve network in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Our findings build on
social and ecological research before (1997-2001), during (2002) and after (2003-2004)
the establishment of marine reserves, which included participant observation in >100
fishing trips and meetings, interviews, as well as fishery dependent and independent
monitoring. We found that locally crafted and enforced harvesting rules led to a rapid
increase in resource abundance. Nevertheless, news about this increase spread quickly
at a regional scale, resulting in poaching from outsiders and a subsequent rapid cascading
effect on fishing resources and locally-designed rule compliance. We show that cooperation
for management of common-pool fisheries, in which marine reserves form a core component
of the system, can emerge, evolve rapidly, and be effective at a local scale even
in recently organized fisheries. Stakeholder participation in monitoring, where there
is a rapid feedback of the systems response, can play a key role in reinforcing cooperation.
However, without cross-scale linkages with higher levels of governance, increase of
local fishery stocks may attract outsiders who, if not restricted, will overharvest
and threaten local governance. Fishers and fishing communities require incentives
to maintain their management efforts. Rewarding local effective management with formal
cross-scale governance recognition and support can generate these incentives.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/6503Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1371/journal.pone.0006253Publication Info
Cudney-Bueno, Richard; & Basurto, Xavier (2009). Lack of cross-scale linkages reduces robustness of community-based fisheries management.
PLoS One, 4(7). pp. e6253. 10.1371/journal.pone.0006253. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/6503.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Xavier Basurto
Truman and Nellie Semans/Alex Brown & Sons Associate Professor
I am interested in the fundamental question of how groups (human and non-human) can
find ways to self-organize, cooperate, and engage in successful collective action
for the benefit of the common good. To do this I strive to understand how the institutions
(formal and informal rules and norms) that govern social behavior, interplay with
biophysical variables to shape social-ecological systems. What kind of institutions
are better able to govern complex-adaptive systems? and how can societies (la

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info