dc.contributor.author |
Basurto, X |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Kingsley, G |
|
dc.contributor.author |
McQueen, K |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Smith, M |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Weible, CM |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2013-04-15T17:32:33Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2010-10-07 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1065-9129 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/6512 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
In 1995, Crawford and Ostrom proposed a grammatical syntax for examining institutional
statements (i.e., rules, norms, and strategies) as part of the institutional analysis
and development framework. This article constitutes the first attempt at applying
the grammatical syntax to code institutional statements using two pieces of U.S. legislation.
The authors illustrate how the grammatical syntax can serve as a basis for collecting,
presenting, and analyzing data in a way that is reliable and conveys valid and substantive
meaning for the researcher. The article concludes by describing some implementation
challenges and ideas for future theoretical and field research. © 2010 University
of Utah.
|
|
dc.publisher |
SAGE Publications |
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
Political Research Quarterly |
|
dc.relation.isversionof |
10.1177/1065912909334430 |
|
dc.title |
A systematic approach to institutional analysis: Applying Crawford and Ostrom's grammar |
|
dc.type |
Journal article |
|
duke.contributor.id |
Basurto, X|0514089 |
|
pubs.begin-page |
523 |
|
pubs.end-page |
537 |
|
pubs.issue |
3 |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Duke |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Marine Science and Conservation |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Nicholas School of the Environment |
|
pubs.publication-status |
Published |
|
pubs.volume |
63 |
|
duke.contributor.orcid |
Basurto, X|0000-0002-5321-3654 |
|