ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Valuing ecosystem services from wetlands restoration in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley
Abstract
This study assesses the value of restoring forested wetlands via the U.S. government's
Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP) in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley by quantifying and
monetizing ecosystem services. The three focal services are greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation,
nitrogen mitigation, and waterfowl recreation. Site- and region-level measurements
of these ecosystem services are combined with process models to quantify their production
on agricultural land, which serves as the baseline, and on restored wetlands. We adjust
and transform these measures into per-hectare, valuation-ready units and monetize
them with prices from emerging ecosystem markets and the environmental economics literature.
By valuing three of the many ecosystem services produced, we generate lower bound
estimates for the total ecosystem value of the wetlands restoration. Social welfare
value is found to be between $1435 and $1486/ha/year, with GHG mitigation valued in
the range of $171 to $222, nitrogen mitigation at $1248, and waterfowl recreation
at $16. Limited to existing markets, the estimate for annual market value is merely
$70/ha, but when fully accounting for potential markets, this estimate rises to $1035/ha.
The estimated social value surpasses the public expenditure or social cost of wetlands
restoration in only 1 year, indicating that the return on public investment is very
attractive for the WRP. Moreover, the potential market value is substantially greater
than landowner opportunity costs, showing that payments to private landowners to restore
wetlands could also be profitable for individual landowners. © 2009 Elsevier B.V.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/6740Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.022Publication Info
Jenkins, WA; Murray, BC; Kramer, RA; & Faulkner, SP (2010). Valuing ecosystem services from wetlands restoration in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley.
Ecological Economics, 69(5). pp. 1051-1061. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.022. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/6740.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Randall Kramer
Juli Plant Grainger Professor Emeritus of Global Environmental Health
Before coming to Duke in 1988, he was on the faculty at Virginia Polytechnic Institute
and State University. He has held visiting positions at IUCN--The World Conservation
Union, the Economic Growth Center at Yale University, and the Indonesian Ministry
of Forestry. He has served as a consultant to the World Bank, World Health Organization
and other international organizations. He was named Duke University's Scholar Teacher
of the Year in 2004.
Kramer's research is focused on the econ
Brian Murray
Research Professor in the Division of Environmental Sciences and Policy
Dr. Brian C. Murray is Interim Director of the Nicholas Institute for Energy, Environment
& Sustainability, Research Professor at the Nicholas School of the Environment (primary)
and Sanford School of Public Policy (secondary), and Faculty Associate of the Duke
Initiative for Science & Society. In 2015 he was Fulbright Visiting Research Chair
in Environment and Economy at University of Ottawa’s Institute of the Environment.
He is widely recognized for his work on the econo
Alphabetical list of authors with Scholars@Duke profiles.

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info