IMPROVING FEDERAL ALLOCATION OF EQIP FUNDING

Abstract

The motivation behind this report is to evaluate and respond to past and current decision pathways employed for determining state allocation of the Environmental Quality Incentives Program [EQIP] funding under the Natural Resource Conservation Service [NRCS]. We work to provide justifiable recommendations for how the allocation of EQIP dollars might be improved, especially as it pertains to improving equity among those states with the highest priority needs. In this project, we worked with our client, a Program Analyst at the North Carolina NRCS office, to tailor our recommendations to the specific concerns of one state. Our client’s specific concern was that North Carolina has historically been positioned lower in the national ranking of EQIP funding that it receives as compared to many other large agricultural states. We reviewed the history of EQIP, examined the past and current decision pathways used to determine federal allocation of conservation dollars to state NRCS offices, conducted interviews among NRCS staff, and quantitatively analyzed the funding allocation process. We provide scenarios for how it might be possible for a state like North Carolina to increase its allocation of EQIP funding and attain better conservation on identified lands of highest priority. In this project, the formula we use to develop our quantitative analysis of the federal EQIP allocation process is the formula used by NRCS for fiscal years 2009-2011. From our analysis, we developed a number of scenarios that propose ways in which the funding formula might be changed to better address different social or environmental issues and to serve those states that, in the past, have struggled to receive the same budgetary support as other states, and so are less likely to see the needs of their farmers and the conservation needs of their land be served to the same degree. Our evaluation led us to make a number of recommendations that we expect will move EQIP more in line with its stated goal of optimizing environmental benefits. Our recommendations are also made with the goal to reduce or eliminate many of the inconsistences and criticisms that have beleaguered past EQIP funding allocation processes.