ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Encouraging Sustainable and Equitable Upgrades to New York City's Affordable Housing Stock
Abstract
This study offers a qualitative appraisal of the interaction between affordable housing
policies and energy efficiency in New York City. We summarize key affordable housing
policies and energy efficiency programs at the federal, state and local levels, profile
relevant government organizations, and assess the current efficiency potential in
New York City's affordable housing stock. We identify confounding barriers that prevent
the full realization of this technical potential. These major barriers include: a
lack of affordable housing energy performance data, a lack of information about existing
funding resources, misalignment between housing subsidies and energy conservation,
substantial upfront investment and transaction costs, underfunding of existing efficiency
programs, and the tenant-landlord split incentive.
Lastly, we recommend strategies to enhance the energy performance of affordable housing
in NYC through policy interventions that benefit both tenants and building owners.
This research will be utilized by BetterBuildingsNY to inform their building advocacy
efforts.
Type
Master's projectPermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/6915Citation
Quinlan, Maureen; & Hou, Ying (2013). Encouraging Sustainable and Equitable Upgrades to New York City's Affordable Housing
Stock. Master's project, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/6915.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Nicholas School of the Environment
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info