Show simple item record

The Effects of Matching Post-transgression Accounts to Targets' Preferences

dc.contributor.advisor Leary, Mark R Toner, Kaitlin Elizabeth 2013-05-13T15:34:35Z 2013-05-13T15:34:35Z 2013
dc.description.abstract <p>Previous research into accounts--the statements that people make to explain undesirable behavior--has looked at either the target's reactions to accounts or the transgressors' account strategies, but has not looked at these together. In four studies, participants were assigned to the role of a transgressor (the person providing a post-transgression account) or a target. Transgressors' use of accounts--excuses, justifications, and exceptions--and their post account expectations for how they and the target would react was measured. These transgressor ratings were then compared to the account preferences and reactions (evaluative and punitive) of the targets who actually read the accounts. Targets whose account preferences were matched were expected to react more positively and to inflict lesser penalties on transgressors than those whose preferences were not matched. Results showed that transgressors were fairly inaccurate in their estimations of target reactions, and did not tend to match the account preferences of their targets. However, some evidence emerged to suggest that targets did generally react positively when their account preferences were matched. Furthermore, the domain of the transgression (whether it was a moral, environmental, religious, or interpersonal transgression) affected the strength and direction of these effects.</p>
dc.subject Social psychology
dc.subject Accounts
dc.subject Exceptions
dc.subject Excuses
dc.subject Justifications
dc.subject Transgressions
dc.title The Effects of Matching Post-transgression Accounts to Targets' Preferences
dc.type Dissertation
dc.department Psychology and Neuroscience

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record