The Perceptual and Decision-Making Processes Guiding Species and Sex Recognition and Rival Assessment in the Jumping Spider Lyssomanes viridis
The goal of this dissertation was to better clarify the sensory and cognitive capabilities and limitations of a size-constrained animal. Because visually-guided behaviors are more experimentally tractable than behaviors guided by other sensory modalities, I chose to study a small animal with an unusually good visual system and a suite of apparently visually-guided behaviors, the jumping spider Lyssomanes viridis (Salticidae). Jumping spiders' principal eyes, which are adapted for the perception of shape and pattern, have the highest measured acuity of any arthropod, but also the narrowest field of view, making salticids a particularly interesting study system for measuring the capabilities and limitations of a tiny animal with small yet apparently highly functional eyes. For my dissertation, I examined the amount and type of visual information gathered in high-stakes encounters; i.e. species and sex recognition and male-male contests over females. In salticids, the wrong assessment of species and sex or fighting ability carries with it the risk of injury or even death. Thus, more information, and especially high-resolution information, should be particularly adaptive in such encounters, and should provide us with a good proxy of the perceptual and cognitive capabilities and limitations of this small animal.
In chapter two, I assayed the amount and type of visual information gathered in the context of species and sex recognition, and tested for crossmodal interactions between pheromones and visual cues. Using computer-animated stimuli, I found that, although males took the time necessary to visually scan both the face and legs of other spiders before deciding whether to threaten, court, or ignore them, their conspecific visual recognition templates were fairly coarse, and resulted in them making numerous misidentifications and frequently courting heterospecific salticids. This was especially true in the presence of conspecific female pheromones. Pheromones appeared to exert further top-down effects on visual recognition of conspecifics by bringing visual recognition templates into working memory, as was inferred from the fact that males spent less time examining conspecific images in the presence of conspecific female pheromones. Pheromones also increased the probability that a non-conspecific spider bearing even a slight resemblance to a conspecific female spider would be recognized and courted as a conspecific female. However, pheromones usually did not hasten the recognition of non-conspecific images; this indicates that males' poorer recognition accuracy in the presence of pheromones was not a result of males' spending less time visually examining non-conspecific images.
In chapter three, I looked for correlations between various visual features and contest success in order to determine what types of visual information opponents could theoretically use to assess their opponents' resource holding potential in contests over females. I found that all measured size-related traits correlated strongly with contest success, but that coloration did not, except in the rare cases in which a smaller male won a contest. In these encounters, males who won, despite being smaller, had less red chelicerae than their opponents. Finally, in chapter four, I used the results of chapter three to begin assessing whether the traits that correlate with contest success are actually assessed by males, and in particular, whether they are assessed visually. To do this, I presented males with various sizes of computer-animated opponents, and found that males were less likely to threaten larger opponents. Thus, males seem to be using visual cues to gather information about the size of their opponents. Whether they evaluate overall size, or more specifically, the size of their opponents' weapons, will be addressed in future work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Duke Dissertations
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info