Characterization of Image Quality for 3D Scatter Corrected Breast CT Images.
Date
2012
Author
Advisors
Tornai, Martin P
Lo, Joseph
Dobbins, III, James
Repository Usage Stats
399
views
views
574
downloads
downloads
Abstract
The goal of this study was to characterize the image quality of our dedicated, quasi-monochromatic
spectrum, cone beam breast imaging system under scatter corrected and non-scatter
corrected conditions for a variety of breast compositions. CT projections were acquired
of a breast phantom containing two concentric sets of acrylic spheres that varied
in size (1-8mm) based on their polar position. The breast phantom was filled with
3 different concentrations of methanol and water, simulating a range of breast densities
(0.79-1.0g/cc); acrylic yarn was sometimes included to simulate connective tissue
of a breast. For each phantom condition, 2D scatter was measured for all projection
angles. Scatter-corrected and uncorrected projections were then reconstructed with
an iterative ordered subsets convex algorithm. Reconstructed image quality was characterized
using SNR and contrast analysis, and followed by a human observer detection task for
the spheres in the different concentric rings. Results show that scatter correction
effectively reduces the cupping artifact and improves image contrast and SNR. Results
from the observer study indicate that there was no statistical difference in the number
or sizes of lesions observed in the scatter versus non-scatter corrected images for
all densities. Nonetheless, applying scatter correction for differing breast conditions
improves overall image quality.
Type
Master's thesisDepartment
Medical PhysicsPermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/7275Citation
Pachon, Jan Harwin (2012). Characterization of Image Quality for 3D Scatter Corrected Breast CT Images. Master's thesis, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/7275.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Masters Theses
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info